Cancer-related fatigue in women with breast cancer: outcomes of a 5-year prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Prolonged and disabling fatigue is prevalent after cancer treatment, but the early natural history of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has not been systematically examined to document consistent presence of symptoms. Hence, relationships to cancer, surgery, and adjuvant therapy are unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study of women receiving adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer was conducted. Women (n = 218) were enrolled after surgery and observed at end treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as well as 5 years. Structured interviews and self-report questionnaires were used to record physical and psychologic health as well as disability and health care utilization. Patients with CRF persisting for 6 months were assessed to exclude alternative medical and psychiatric causes of fatigue. Predictors of persistent fatigue, mood disturbance, and health care utilization were sought by logistic regression. RESULTS: The case rate for CRF was 24% (n = 51) postsurgery and 31% (n = 69) at end of treatment; it became persistent in 11% (n = 24) at 6 months and 6% (n = 12) at 12 months. At each time point, approximately one third of the patients had comorbid mood disturbance. Persistent CRF was predicted by tumor size but not demographic, psychologic, surgical, or hematologic parameters. CRF was associated with significant disability and health care utilization. CONCLUSION: CRF is common but generally runs a self-limiting course. Much of the previously reported high rates of persistent CRF may be attributable to factors unrelated to the cancer or its treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fatigue in breast cancer survivors is associated with pre-treatment fatigue, pain, dyspnea, depression, physical inactivity, high body mass index, significant disability, health care utilization, and poor HRQoL.
“Other studies have found an association between fatigue and pre-treatment fatigue (Bower, 2014), pain (Kim et al., 2008), dyspnea, depression, physical inactivity and high body mass index (Bower, 2014), significant disability and health care utilization (Goldstein et al., 2012) and poor HRQoL (Kim et al., 2008).”
From A guided internet-delivered individually-tailored ACT-influenced cognitive behavioural intervention to improve psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer survivors (iNNOVBC): Study protocol (2019) · cites this paper as Goldstein et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Goldstein, D., Bennett, B. K., Webber, K., Boyle, F., de Souza, P. L., Wilcken, N. R. C., Scott, E. M., Toppler, R., Murie, P., O'Malley, L., McCourt, J., Friedlander, M., Hickie, I. B., & Lloyd, A. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- David Goldstein, Barbara K. Bennett, Kate Webber, and Michael Friedlander, Prince of Wales Hospital; Fran Boyle and Ruth Toppler, The Mater Hospital; Paul L. de Souza and Linda O'Malley, St George Hospital; Nicholas R.C. Wilcken and Penelope Murie, Westmead Hospital; Nicholas R.C. Wilcken and Junie McCourt, Nepean Hospital; Fran Boyle, Nicholas R.C. Wilcken, Elizabeth M. Scott, and Ian B. Hickie, University of Sydney; David Goldstein, Barbara K. Bennett, Kate Webber, Michael Friedlander, and Andrew R....
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2012-05-20
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1805-1812
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2110580798
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Keywords
- cancer-related fatigue, breast cancer, adjuvant therapy, early breast cancer, persistent fatigue, mood disturbance, disability, health care utilization, tumor size
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Breast Neoplasms, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, New South Wales, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Risk Assessment, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Tumor Burden, Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review