Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 729

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Assessment

Open access
de Jong, Mechteld C., Nathan, Hari, Sotiropoulos, Georgios C., Paul, Andreas, Alexandrescu, Sorin, Marques, Hugo, Pulitano, Carlo, Barroso, Eduardo, Clary, Bryan M., Aldrighetti, Luca, Ferrone, Cristina R., Zhu, Andrew X., Bauer, Todd W., Walters, Dustin M., Gamblin, T. Clark, Nguyen, Kevin T., Turley, Ryan, Popescu, Irinel, Hubert, Catherine, Meyer, Stephanie, Schulick, Richard D., Choti, Michael A., Gigot, Jean-Francois, Mentha, Gilles, Pawlik, Timothy M.·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To identify factors associated with outcome after surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and examine the impact of lymph node (LN) assessment on survival. Patients and Methods: From an international multi-institutional database, 449 patients who underwent surgery for ICC between 1973 and 2010 were identified. Clinical and pathologic data were evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: Median tumor size was 6.5 cm. Most patients had a solitary tumor (73%) and no vascular invasion (69%). Median survival was 27 months, and 5-year survival was 31%. Factors associated with adverse prognosis included positive margin status (hazard ratio [HR], 2.20; P < .001), multiple lesions (HR, 1.80; P = .001), and vascular invasion (HR, 1.59; P = .015). Tumor size was not a prognostic factor (HR, 1.03; P = .23). Patients were stratified using the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer T1, T2a, and T2b categories (seventh edition) in a discrete step-wise fashion (P < .001). Lymphadenectomy was performed in 248 patients (55%); 74 of these (30%) had LN metastasis. LN metastasis was associated with worse outcome (median survival: N0, 30 months v N1, 24 months; P = .03). Although patients with no LN metastasis were able to be stratified by tumor number and vascular invasion (N0; P < .001), among patients with N1 disease, multiple tumors and vascular invasion, either alone or together, failed to discriminate patients into discrete prognostic groups (P = .34). Conclusion: Although tumor size provides no prognostic information, tumor number, vascular invasion, and LN metastasis were associated with survival. N1 status adversely affected overall survival and also influenced the relative effect of tumor number and vascular invasion on prognosis. Lymphadenectomy should be strongly considered for ICC, because up to 30% of patients will have LN metastasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.35.6519

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 729

Metadata

Authors
de Jong, M. C., Nathan, H., Sotiropoulos, G. C., Paul, A., Alexandrescu, S., Marques, H., Pulitano, C., Barroso, E., Clary, B. M., Aldrighetti, L., Ferrone, C. R., Zhu, A. X., Bauer, T. W., Walters, D. M., Gamblin, T. C., Nguyen, K. T., Turley, R., Popescu, I., Hubert, C., Meyer, S., Schulick, R. D., Choti, M. A., Gigot, J.-F., Mentha, G., & Pawlik, T. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-08-10
Volume
29
Issue
23
Pages
3140-3145
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2101637122
Cited by
729
References
2
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.35.6519
The paper
de Jong, M. C., Nathan, H., Sotiropoulos, G. C., Paul, A., Alexandrescu, S., Marques, H., Pulitano, C., Barroso, E., Clary, B. M., Aldrighetti, L., Ferrone, C. R., Zhu, A. X., Bauer, T. W., Walters, D. M., Gamblin, T. C., Nguyen, K. T., Turley, R., Popescu, I., Hubert, C., . . . Pawlik, T. M. (2011). Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Assessment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.35.6519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.