The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Assessment
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To identify factors associated with outcome after surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and examine the impact of lymph node (LN) assessment on survival. Patients and Methods: From an international multi-institutional database, 449 patients who underwent surgery for ICC between 1973 and 2010 were identified. Clinical and pathologic data were evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: Median tumor size was 6.5 cm. Most patients had a solitary tumor (73%) and no vascular invasion (69%). Median survival was 27 months, and 5-year survival was 31%. Factors associated with adverse prognosis included positive margin status (hazard ratio [HR], 2.20; P < .001), multiple lesions (HR, 1.80; P = .001), and vascular invasion (HR, 1.59; P = .015). Tumor size was not a prognostic factor (HR, 1.03; P = .23). Patients were stratified using the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer T1, T2a, and T2b categories (seventh edition) in a discrete step-wise fashion (P < .001). Lymphadenectomy was performed in 248 patients (55%); 74 of these (30%) had LN metastasis. LN metastasis was associated with worse outcome (median survival: N0, 30 months v N1, 24 months; P = .03). Although patients with no LN metastasis were able to be stratified by tumor number and vascular invasion (N0; P < .001), among patients with N1 disease, multiple tumors and vascular invasion, either alone or together, failed to discriminate patients into discrete prognostic groups (P = .34). Conclusion: Although tumor size provides no prognostic information, tumor number, vascular invasion, and LN metastasis were associated with survival. N1 status adversely affected overall survival and also influenced the relative effect of tumor number and vascular invasion on prognosis. Lymphadenectomy should be strongly considered for ICC, because up to 30% of patients will have LN metastasis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Bridgewater, J., Galle, P. R., Khan, S. A., Llovet, J. M., Park, J.-W., Patel, T., Pawlik, T. M., & Gores, G. J. (2014) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.021 · Cited by 1,511
Self-citationBiliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Valle, J. W., Borbath, I., Khan, S. A., Huguet, F., Gruenberger, T., & Arnold, D. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw324 · Cited by 675
Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Knowledge and New Developments
Blechacz, B. (2017) · Gut and Liver · doi:10.5009/gnl15568 · Cited by 485
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement
Weber, S. M., Ribero, D., O'Reilly, E. M., Kokudo, N., Miyazaki, M., & Pawlik, T. M. (2015) · HPB · doi:10.1111/hpb.12441 · Cited by 472
Self-citationMoris, D., Palta, M., Kim, C., Allen, P. J., Morse, M. A., & Lidsky, M. E. (2023) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21759 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- de Jong, M. C., Nathan, H., Sotiropoulos, G. C., Paul, A., Alexandrescu, S., Marques, H., Pulitano, C., Barroso, E., Clary, B. M., Aldrighetti, L., Ferrone, C. R., Zhu, A. X., Bauer, T. W., Walters, D. M., Gamblin, T. C., Nguyen, K. T., Turley, R., Popescu, I., Hubert, C., Meyer, S., Schulick, R. D., Choti, M. A., Gigot, J.-F., Mentha, G., & Pawlik, T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2011-08-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3140-3145
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2101637122
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.35.6519
- The paper
- de Jong, M. C., Nathan, H., Sotiropoulos, G. C., Paul, A., Alexandrescu, S., Marques, H., Pulitano, C., Barroso, E., Clary, B. M., Aldrighetti, L., Ferrone, C. R., Zhu, A. X., Bauer, T. W., Walters, D. M., Gamblin, T. C., Nguyen, K. T., Turley, R., Popescu, I., Hubert, C., . . . Pawlik, T. M. (2011). Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Lymph Node Assessment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.35.6519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.