The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Plus Vandetanib Versus Docetaxel Plus Placebo in Platinum-Pretreated Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Vandetanib is an oral once-daily tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor. Vandetanib in combination with docetaxel was assessed in patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) who progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to determine whether vandetanib 100 mg plus docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 intravenously every 21 days prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus docetaxel. The study was designed to detect a 60% improvement in median PFS with 80% power and one-sided α at 5%. Patients receiving docetaxel plus placebo had the option to cross over to single-agent vandetanib at progression. Overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety were secondary objectives. Results: In all, 142 patients were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of therapy. Median PFS was 2.56 months for the docetaxel plus vandetanib arm versus 1.58 months for the docetaxel plus placebo arm, and the hazard ratio for PFS was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.49; P = .9). ORR and OS were not different between both arms. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were more commonly seen in the docetaxel plus vandetanib arm and included rash/photosensitivity (11% v 0%) and diarrhea (7% v 0%). Among 37 patients who crossed over to single-agent vandetanib, ORR was 3% and OS was 5.2 months. Conclusion: In this platinum-pretreated population of advanced UC, the addition of vandetanib to docetaxel did not result in a significant improvement in PFS, ORR, or OS. The toxicity of vandetanib plus docetaxel was greater than that for vendetanib plus placebo. Single-agent vandetanib activity was minimal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20073 · Cited by 12,596
Cited by
Rosenberg, J. E., Hoffman-Censits, J., Powles, T., van der Heijden, M. S., Balar, A. V., Necchi, A., Dawson, N., O'Donnell, P. H., Balmanoukian, A., Loriot, Y., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00561-4 · Cited by 3,669
Self-citationMPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer
Powles, T., Eder, J. P., Fine, G. D., Braiteh, F. S., Loriot, Y., Cruz, C., Bellmunt, J., Burris, H. A., Petrylak, D. P., Teng, S.-L., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13904 · Cited by 2,381
Self-citationPowles, T., Durán, I., van der Heijden, M. S., Loriot, Y., Vogelzang, N. J., De Giorgi, U., Oudard, S., Retz, M. M., Castellano, D., Bamias, A., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)33297-x · Cited by 1,408
Krchniakova, M., Skoda, J., Neradil, J., Chlapek, P., & Veselska, R. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21093157 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Choueiri, T. K., Ross, R. W., Jacobus, S., Vaishampayan, U., Yu, E. Y., Quinn, D. I., Hahn, N. M., Hutson, T. E., Sonpavde, G., Morrissey, S. C., Buckle, G. C., Kim, W. Y., Petrylak, D. P., Ryan, C. W., Eisenberger, M. A., Mortazavi, A., Bubley, G. J., Taplin, M.-E., Rosenberg, J. E., & Kantoff, P. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2012-02-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 507-512
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2152194109
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Plus Vandetanib Versus Docetaxel Plus Placebo in Platinum-Pretreated Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.37.7002
- The paper
- Choueiri, T. K., Ross, R. W., Jacobus, S., Vaishampayan, U., Yu, E. Y., Quinn, D. I., Hahn, N. M., Hutson, T. E., Sonpavde, G., Morrissey, S. C., Buckle, G. C., Kim, W. Y., Petrylak, D. P., Ryan, C. W., Eisenberger, M. A., Mortazavi, A., Bubley, G. J., Taplin, M.-E., Rosenberg, J. E., & Kantoff, P. W. (2012). Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Plus Vandetanib Versus Docetaxel Plus Placebo in Platinum-Pretreated Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.7002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.