Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase III Trial of Cetuximab With Continuous or Intermittent Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) Versus FLOX Alone in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NORDIC-VII Study

Tveit, Kjell Magne, Guren, Tormod, Glimelius, Bengt, Pfeiffer, Per, Sorbye, Halfdan, Pyrhonen, Seppo, Sigurdsson, Fridbjorn, Kure, Elin, Ikdahl, Tone, Skovlund, Eva, Fokstuen, Tone, Hansen, Flemming, Hofsli, Eva, Birkemeyer, Elke, Johnsson, Anders, Starkhammar, Hans, Yilmaz, Mette Karen, Keldsen, Nina, Erdal, Anne Berit, Dajani, Olav, Dahl, Olav, Christoffersen, Thoralf·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The NORDIC-VII multicenter phase III trial investigated the efficacy of cetuximab when added to bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX), administered continuously or intermittently, in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on treatment outcome was also investigated. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard Nordic FLOX (arm A), cetuximab and FLOX (arm B), or cetuximab combined with intermittent FLOX (arm C). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), response rate, R0 resection rate, and safety were secondary end points. Results: Of the 571 patients randomly assigned, 566 were evaluable in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. KRAS and BRAF mutation analyses were obtained in 498 (88%) and 457 patients (81%), respectively. KRAS mutations were present in 39% of the tumors; 12% of tumors had BRAF mutations. The presence of BRAF mutations was a strong negative prognostic factor. In the ITT population, median PFS was 7.9, 8.3, and 7.3 months for the three arms, respectively (not significantly different). OS was almost identical for the three groups (20.4, 19.7, 20.3 months, respectively), and confirmed response rates were 41%, 49%, and 47%, respectively. In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, cetuximab did not provide any additional benefit compared with FLOX alone. In patients with KRAS mutations, no significant difference was detected, although a trend toward improved PFS was observed in arm B. The regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion: Cetuximab did not add significant benefit to the Nordic FLOX regimen in first-line treatment of mCRC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.38.0915

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 533

Metadata

Authors
Tveit, K. M., Guren, T., Glimelius, B., Pfeiffer, P., Sorbye, H., Pyrhonen, S., Sigurdsson, F., Kure, E., Ikdahl, T., Skovlund, E., Fokstuen, T., Hansen, F., Hofsli, E., Birkemeyer, E., Johnsson, A., Starkhammar, H., Yilmaz, M. K., Keldsen, N., Erdal, A. B., Dajani, O., Dahl, O., & Christoffersen, T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-05-20
Volume
30
Issue
15
Pages
1755-1762
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2129255527
Cited by
533
References
34
FWCI
35.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Trial of Cetuximab With Continuous or Intermittent Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) Versus FLOX Alone in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NORDIC-VII Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.38.0915
The paper
Tveit, K. M., Guren, T., Glimelius, B., Pfeiffer, P., Sorbye, H., Pyrhonen, S., Sigurdsson, F., Kure, E., Ikdahl, T., Skovlund, E., Fokstuen, T., Hansen, F., Hofsli, E., Birkemeyer, E., Johnsson, A., Starkhammar, H., Yilmaz, M. K., Keldsen, N., Erdal, A. B., . . . Christoffersen, T. (2012). Phase III Trial of Cetuximab With Continuous or Intermittent Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) Versus FLOX Alone in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NORDIC-VII Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.0915

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.