Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progression-Free Survival: Meaningful or Simply Measurable?

Booth, Christopher M., Eisenhauer, Elizabeth A.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

The last few years have seen an increase in the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of new agents in metastatic solid tumors using progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary end point. Some trials showing improvement in PFS, without a correspondingincreaseinoverallsurvival(OS),haveledtoapprovalofnew drugs and/or changes in standard of care. This suggests a growing belief in the oncology community that delaying progression in metastaticdiseaseisaworthygoal,evenifOSisnotimproved.Butisanew treatment that improves PFS really an advance for patients? Or is it only lowering the bar to declare active some of our much-heralded new molecular targeted therapies? We believe that as a community, this trend requires discussion and debate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.38.7571

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Booth, C. M., & Eisenhauer, E. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-04-01
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
1030-1033
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2126251787
Cited by
324
References
37
FWCI
32.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression-Free Survival: Meaningful or Simply Measurable? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.38.7571
The paper
Booth, C. M., & Eisenhauer, E. A. (2012). Progression-Free Survival: Meaningful or Simply Measurable? Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.7571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.