Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Significance of the European LeukemiaNet Standardized System for Reporting Cytogenetic and Molecular Alterations in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Open access
Mrózek, Krzysztof, Marcucci, Guido, Nicolet, Deedra, Maharry, Kati S., Becker, Heiko, Whitman, Susan P., Metzeler, Klaus H., Schwind, Sebastian, Wu, Yue-Zhong, Kohlschmidt, Jessica, Pettenati, Mark J., Heerema, Nyla A., Block, AnneMarie W., Patil, Shivanand R., Baer, Maria R., Kolitz, Jonathan E., Moore, Joseph O., Carroll, Andrew J., Stone, Richard M., Larson, Richard A., Bloomfield, Clara D.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic significance of the international European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines for reporting genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods: We analyzed 1,550 adults with primary AML, treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B first-line trials, who had pretreatment cytogenetics and, for cytogenetically normal patients, mutational status of NPM1, CEBPA, and FLT3 available. We compared complete remission (CR) rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) among patients classified into the four ELN genetic groups (favorable, intermediate-I, intermediate-II, adverse) separately for 818 younger (age < 60 years) and 732 older (age ≥ 60 years) patients. Results: The percentages of younger versus older patients in the favorable (41% v 20%; P < .001), intermediate-II (19% v 30%; P < .001), and adverse (22% v 31%; P < .001) genetic groups differed. The favorable group had the best and the adverse group the worst CR rates, DFS, and OS in both age groups. Both intermediate groups had significantly worse outcomes than the favorable but better than the adverse group. Intermediate-I and intermediate-II groups in older patients had similar outcomes, whereas the intermediate-II group in younger patients had better OS but not better CR rates or DFS than the intermediate-I group. The prognostic significance of ELN classification was confirmed by multivariable analyses. For each ELN group, older patients had worse outcomes than younger patients. Conclusion: The ELN classification clearly separates the genetic groups by outcome, supporting its use for risk stratification in clinical trials. Because they have different proportions of genetic alterations and outcomes, younger and older patients should be reported separately when using the ELN classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2012.43.4738

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Mrózek, K., Marcucci, G., Nicolet, D., Maharry, K. S., Becker, H., Whitman, S. P., Metzeler, K. H., Schwind, S., Wu, Y.-Z., Kohlschmidt, J., Pettenati, M. J., Heerema, N. A., Block, A. W., Patil, S. R., Baer, M. R., Kolitz, J. E., Moore, J. O., Carroll, A. J., Stone, R. M., Larson, R. A., & Bloomfield, C. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-12-20
Volume
30
Issue
36
Pages
4515-4523
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2114441791
Cited by
406
References
50
FWCI
21.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of the European LeukemiaNet Standardized System for Reporting Cytogenetic and Molecular Alterations in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2012.43.4738
The paper
Mrózek, K., Marcucci, G., Nicolet, D., Maharry, K. S., Becker, H., Whitman, S. P., Metzeler, K. H., Schwind, S., Wu, Y.-Z., Kohlschmidt, J., Pettenati, M. J., Heerema, N. A., Block, A. W., Patil, S. R., Baer, M. R., Kolitz, J. E., Moore, J. O., Carroll, A. J., Stone, R. M., . . . Bloomfield, C. D. (2012). Prognostic Significance of the European LeukemiaNet Standardized System for Reporting Cytogenetic and Molecular Alterations in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.43.4738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.