Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Achieving High-Quality Cancer Survivorship Care

Open access
McCabe, Mary S., Bhatia, Smita, Oeffinger, Kevin C., Reaman, Gregory H., Tyne, Courtney, Wollins, Dana S., Hudson, Melissa M.·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Over the past several decades, the number of cancer survivors has increased dramatically as a result of improved early detection of first malignancies and effective therapies. There are more than 13 million cancer survivors in the United States today.1 This number is expected to reach 18 million by 2022.1 These data underscore the public health magnitude of cancer survivorship and the importance of efforts to characterize and address the health concerns of cancer survivors. Although the cancer survivorship population is heterogeneous, many survivors face distinct and serious health care issues. Cancer survivors are at increased risk for long-term morbidity and premature mortality, related directly to the cancer itself, to pre-existing comorbidities, and to exposure to therapy. The risk-benefit ratios for many of the methods of disease prevention, screening, and treatment may be shifted in survivors because cancer- and treatment-related changes can lead to premature development of age-related changes, atypical presentations of common health conditions, an increased risk of developing these health conditions, and poor response to treatments that are usually effective for these conditions. Additionally, the higher prevalence of coexisting comorbidities in the elderly may become further exacerbated because of treatment. As a result, the many patients who become survivors will require preventive and general medical care subsequent to their cancer-related care. Cancer survivors are an important group to receive risk assessment and prevention services, and oncologists are increasingly providing counseling and services to that group. In a 2004 survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) members, roughly three quarters of oncologists said they believe they should be involved in the ongoing care of patients who are survivors of cancer, including general health maintenance, screening, and prevention.2 However, only 60% said they feel comfortable providing these services.2 The survey also suggested that oncologists define their role in cancer prevention and risk assessment quite broadly and beyond providing services in their own practices.2,3 As more patients with cancer transition back to primary care, many groups have identified the need for greater coordination of care and increased attention to health promotion and disease prevention in survivors. These organizations are looking to oncology professionals to develop a coordinated strategy for providing follow-up medical care to the growing population of cancer survivors. As the leading medical professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, prevention, and delivery of high-quality patient care, ASCO is committed to improving the care of cancer survivors. ASCO first established a Cancer Survivorship Task Force in 2004 to address the growing issues related to cancer survivorship. In 2005, the task force led the ASCO partnership in cosponsoring a symposium on cancer survivorship with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to chart a course for care of cancer survivors and fill gaps in patients' long-term care. This workshop focused on implementation of the 10 recommendations contained in the IOM report “From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition.”4 An outcome of the symposium was the prioritization of several key ASCO initiatives, including development of cancer treatment plan and summary templates, establishment of the Patient and Survivor Care Track at ASCO annual meetings, development of a survivorship guideline addressing fertility preservation, inclusion of survivorship topics in the ASCO core curriculum, and publication of numerous survivorship articles in ASCO publications. Additionally, ASCO partnered with the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship to establish the Cancer Quality Alliance in response to the IOM call for public-private partnerships to monitor and improve the care that survivors receive. In 2011, ASCO established the Cancer Survivorship Committee to provide long-term leadership and oversight of its growing number of cancer survivorship activities. In the past year, the committee has been working with appropriate groups within and outside of ASCO to enhance the quality and quantity of initiatives addressing cancer survivorship. The committee has developed a comprehensive agenda to assist ASCO members in the delivery of quality survivorship care. The objective of this statement is to present ASCO recommendations for improving the care of cancer survivors and the role of ASCO in this important endeavor, as envisioned by the Cancer Survivorship Committee. Specific efforts will be concentrated on developing guidance for oncology care providers on the clinical management of cancer survivors, increasing collaboration between oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs) in the provision of cancer survivorship services, improving health professional education and training, incr

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2012.46.6854

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
McCabe, M. S., Bhatia, S., Oeffinger, K. C., Reaman, G. H., Tyne, C., Wollins, D. S., & Hudson, M. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-02-10
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
631-640
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2150049760
Cited by
469
References
39
FWCI
25.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Achieving High-Quality Cancer Survivorship Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2012.46.6854
The paper
McCabe, M. S., Bhatia, S., Oeffinger, K. C., Reaman, G. H., Tyne, C., Wollins, D. S., & Hudson, M. M. (2013). American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Achieving High-Quality Cancer Survivorship Care. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.46.6854

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.