Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disabling Immune Tolerance by Programmed Death-1 Blockade With Pidilizumab After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of an International Phase II Trial

Open access
Armand, Philippe, Nagler, Arnon, Weller, Edie A., Devine, Steven M., Avigan, David E., Chen, Yi-Bin, Kaminski, Mark S., Holland, H. Kent, Winter, Jane N., Mason, James R., Fay, Joseph W., Rizzieri, David A., Hosing, Chitra M., Ball, Edward D., Uberti, Joseph P., Lazarus, Hillard M., Mapara, Markus Y., Gregory, Stephanie A., Timmerman, John M., Andorsky, David, Or, Reuven, Waller, Edmund K., Rotem-Yehudar, Rinat, Gordon, Leo I.·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint pathway may be usurped by tumors, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), to evade immune surveillance. The reconstituting immune landscape after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) may be particularly favorable for breaking immune tolerance through PD-1 blockade. Patients and Methods: We conducted an international phase II study of pidilizumab, an anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with DLBCL undergoing AHSCT, with correlative studies of lymphocyte subsets. Patients received three doses of pidilizumab beginning 1 to 3 months after AHSCT. Results: Sixty-six eligible patients were treated. Toxicity was mild. At 16 months after the first treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) was 0.72 (90% CI, 0.60 to 0.82), meeting the primary end point. Among the 24 high-risk patients who remained positive on positron emission tomography after salvage chemotherapy, the 16-month PFS was 0.70 (90% CI, 0.51 to 0.82). Among the 35 patients with measurable disease after AHSCT, the overall response rate after pidilizumab treatment was 51%. Treatment was associated with increases in circulating lymphocyte subsets including PD-L1E–bearing lymphocytes, suggesting an on-target in vivo effect of pidilizumab. Conclusion: This is the first demonstration of clinical activity of PD-1 blockade in DLBCL. Given these results, PD-1 blockade after AHSCT using pidilizumab may represent a promising therapeutic strategy in this disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2012.48.3685

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Armand, P., Nagler, A., Weller, E. A., Devine, S. M., Avigan, D. E., Chen, Y.-B., Kaminski, M. S., Holland, H. K., Winter, J. N., Mason, J. R., Fay, J. W., Rizzieri, D. A., Hosing, C. M., Ball, E. D., Uberti, J. P., Lazarus, H. M., Mapara, M. Y., Gregory, S. A., Timmerman, J. M., Andorsky, D., Or, R., Waller, E. K., Rotem-Yehudar, R., & Gordon, L. I.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-11-20
Volume
31
Issue
33
Pages
4199-4206
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2105396178
Cited by
440
References
4
FWCI
47.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.