Cited by 123Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Plus Hypnosis Intervention to Control Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Open access
Montgomery, Guy H., David, Daniel, Kangas, Maria, Green, Sheryl, Sucala, Madalina, Bovbjerg, Dana H., Hallquist, Michael N., Schnur, Julie B.·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis (CBTH) to control fatigue in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. We hypothesized that patients in the CBTH group receiving radiotherapy would have lower levels of fatigue than patients in an attention control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 200) were randomly assigned to either the CBTH (n = 100; mean age, 55.59 years) or attention control (n = 100; mean age, 55.97 years) group. Fatigue was measured at four time points (baseline, end of radiotherapy, 4 weeks, and 6 months after radiotherapy). Fatigue was measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue subscale and Visual Analog Scales (VASs; Fatigue and Muscle Weakness). RESULTS: The CBTH group had significantly lower levels of fatigue (FACIT) at the end of radiotherapy (z, 6.73; P < .001), 4-week follow-up (z, 6.98; P < .001), and 6-month follow-up (z, 7.99; P < .001) assessments. Fatigue VAS scores were significantly lower in the CBTH group at the end of treatment (z, 5.81; P < .001) and at the 6-month follow-up (z, 4.56; P < .001), but not at the 4-week follow-up (P < .07). Muscle Weakness VAS scores were significantly lower in the CBTH group at the end of treatment (z, 9.30; P < .001) and at the 6-month follow-up (z, 3.10; P < .02), but not at the 4-week follow-up (P < .13). CONCLUSION: The results support CBTH as an evidence-based intervention to control fatigue in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. CBTH is noninvasive, has no adverse effects, and its beneficial effects persist long after the last intervention session. CBTH seems to be a candidate for future dissemination and implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.49.3437

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 123

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Walen S, Digiuseppe R, Dryden W: A Practi- tioner's Guide to Rational Emotive Therapy (ed 2). New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 3-377

Authors
Montgomery, G. H., David, D., Kangas, M., Green, S., Sucala, M., Bovbjerg, D. H., Hallquist, M. N., & Schnur, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-02-20
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
557-563
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2096202341
Cited by
123
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r25ca081137-15)
  • National Cancer Institute (R25-CA081137, CA159530, CA081137, R25CA129094, R03CA159530, CA129094, K07CA131473, R25CA166042, CA166042, CA131473)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnosis, cancer-related fatigue, breast cancer, radiotherapy, fatigue management, muscle weakness, FACIT-Fatigue, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review