Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PRECEDENT: A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Vintafolide (EC145) and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in Combination Versus PLD Alone in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Naumann, R. Wendel, Coleman, Robert L., Burger, Robert A., Sausville, Edward A., Kutarska, Elzbieta, Ghamande, Sharad A., Gabrail, Nashat Y., DePasquale, Stephen E., Nowara, Elzbieta, Gilbert, Lucy, Gersh, Robert H., Teneriello, Michael G., Harb, Wael A., Konstantinopoulos, Panagiotis A., Penson, Richard T., Symanowski, James T., Lovejoy, Chandra D., Leamon, Christopher P., Morgenstern, David E., Messmann, Richard A.·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Vintafolide (EC145) is a folic acid–desacetylvinblastine conjugate that binds to the folate receptor (FR), which is expressed on the majority of epithelial ovarian cancers. This randomized phase II trial evaluated vintafolide combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) compared with PLD alone. The utility of an FR-targeted imaging agent, 99m Tc-etarfolatide (EC20), in selecting patients likely to benefit from vintafolide was also examined. Patients and Methods: Women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who had undergone ≤ two prior cytotoxic regimens were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to PLD (50 mg/m 2 intravenously [IV] once every 28 days) with or without vintafolide (2.5 mg IV three times per week during weeks 1 and 3). Etarfolatide scanning was optional. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the groups. Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 149 patients. Median PFS was 5.0 and 2.7 months for the vintafolide plus PLD and PLD-alone arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.96; P = .031). The greatest benefit was observed in patients with 100% of lesions positive for FR, with median PFS of 5.5 compared with 1.5 months for PLD alone (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.85; P = .013). The group of patients with FR-positive disease (10% to 90%) experienced some PFS improvement (HR, 0.873), whereas patients with disease that did not express FR experienced no PFS benefit (HR, 1.806). Conclusion: Vintafolide plus PLD is the first combination to demonstrate an improvement over standard therapy in a randomized trial of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Etarfolatide can identify patients likely to benefit from vintafolide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.49.7685

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Naumann, R. W., Coleman, R. L., Burger, R. A., Sausville, E. A., Kutarska, E., Ghamande, S. A., Gabrail, N. Y., DePasquale, S. E., Nowara, E., Gilbert, L., Gersh, R. H., Teneriello, M. G., Harb, W. A., Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Penson, R. T., Symanowski, J. T., Lovejoy, C. D., Leamon, C. P., Morgenstern, D. E., & Messmann, R. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-12-10
Volume
31
Issue
35
Pages
4400-4406
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2133374918
Cited by
238
References
2
FWCI
36.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PRECEDENT: A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Vintafolide (EC145) and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in Combination Versus PLD Alone in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.49.7685
The paper
Naumann, R. W., Coleman, R. L., Burger, R. A., Sausville, E. A., Kutarska, E., Ghamande, S. A., Gabrail, N. Y., DePasquale, S. E., Nowara, E., Gilbert, L., Gersh, R. H., Teneriello, M. G., Harb, W. A., Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Penson, R. T., Symanowski, J. T., Lovejoy, C. D., Leamon, C. P., Morgenstern, D. E., & Messmann, R. A. (2013). PRECEDENT: A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Vintafolide (EC145) and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in Combination Versus PLD Alone in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.49.7685

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.