The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Imaging in the Staging and Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Recent advances in imaging, use of prognostic indices, and molecular profiling techniques have the potential to improve disease characterization and outcomes in lymphoma. International trials are under way to test image-based response–adapted treatment guided by early interim positron emission tomography (PET) –computed tomography (CT). Progress in imaging is influencing trial design and affecting clinical practice. In particular, a five-point scale to grade response using PET-CT, which can be adapted to suit requirements for early- and late-response assessment with good interobserver agreement, is becoming widely used both in practice- and response-adapted trials. A workshop held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas (ICML) in 2011 concluded that revision to current staging and response criteria was timely. Methods: An imaging working group composed of representatives from major international cooperative groups was asked to review the literature, share knowledge about research in progress, and identify key areas for research pertaining to imaging and lymphoma. Results: A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Menton, France, and the 12th ICML in Lugano, Switzerland, to update the International Harmonisation Project guidance regarding PET. Recommendations were made to optimize the use of PET-CT in staging and response assessment of lymphoma, including qualitative and quantitative methods. Conclusion: This article comprises the consensus reached to update guidance on the use of PET-CT for staging and response assessment for [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas in clinical practice and late-phase trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spaepen, K., Stroobants, S., Dupont, P., Vandenberghe, P., Thomas, J., de Groot, T., Balzarini, J., De Wolf-Peeters, C., Mortelmans, L., & Verhoef, G. (2002) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf256 · Cited by 410
Repeatability of 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements in Tumors: A Metaanalysis
de Langen, A. J., Vincent, A., Velasquez, L. M., van Tinteren, H., Boellaard, R., Shankar, L. K., Boers, M., Smit, E. F., Stroobants, S., Weber, W. A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.095299 · Cited by 157
Self-citationImpact of Intravenous Insulin on 18F-FDG PET in Diabetic Cancer Patients
Roy, F.-N., Beaulieu, S., Boucher, L., Bourdeau, I., & Cohade, C. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.056283 · Cited by 63
Cited by
Cheson, B. D., Fisher, R. I., Barrington, S. F., Cavalli, F., Schwartz, L. H., Zucca, E., & Lister, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.54.8800 · Cited by 5,715
Self-citationFDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0
Boellaard, R., Delgado-Bolton, R., Oyen, W. J. G., Giammarile, F., Tatsch, K., Eschner, W., Verzijlbergen, F. J., Barrington, S. F., Pike, L. C., Weber, W. A., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x · Cited by 3,303
Self-citationKumar, S., Paiva, B., Anderson, K. C., Durie, B., Landgren, O., Moreau, P., Munshi, N., Lonial, S., Bladé, J., Mateos, M.-V., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30206-6 · Cited by 3,061
Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies
O'Connor, J. P. B., Aboagye, E. O., Adams, J. E., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Barrington, S. F., Beer, A. J., Boellaard, R., Bohndiek, S. E., Brady, M., Brown, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.162 · Cited by 1,091
Self-citationHodgkin's lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Eichenauer, D. A., Engert, A., André, M., Federico, M., Illidge, T., Hutchings, M., & Ladetto, M. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu181 · Cited by 474
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrington, S. F., Mikhaeel, N. G., Kostakoglu, L., Meignan, M., Hutchings, M., Müeller, S. P., Schwartz, L. H., Zucca, E., Fisher, R. I., Trotman, J., Hoekstra, O. S., Hicks, R. J., O'Doherty, M. J., Hustinx, R., Biggi, A., & Cheson, B. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2014-09-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 3048-3058
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2131900456
- Cited by
- 1,665
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 98.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Imaging in the Staging and Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.53.5229
- The paper
- Barrington, S. F., Mikhaeel, N. G., Kostakoglu, L., Meignan, M., Hutchings, M., Müeller, S. P., Schwartz, L. H., Zucca, E., Fisher, R. I., Trotman, J., Hoekstra, O. S., Hicks, R. J., O'Doherty, M. J., Hustinx, R., Biggi, A., & Cheson, B. D. (2014). Role of Imaging in the Staging and Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.53.5229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.