The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab for Stage III to IV Head and Neck Carcinoma: RTOG 0522
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Combining cisplatin or cetuximab with radiation improves overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III or IV head and neck carcinoma (HNC). Cetuximab plus platinum regimens also increase OS in metastatic HNC. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group launched a phase III trial to test the hypothesis that adding cetuximab to the radiation-cisplatin platform improves progression-free survival (PFS). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with stage III or IV HNC were randomly assigned to receive radiation and cisplatin without (arm A) or with (arm B) cetuximab. Acute and late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). Outcomes were correlated with patient and tumor features and markers. Results: Of 891 analyzed patients, 630 were alive at analysis (median follow-up, 3.8 years). Cetuximab plus cisplatin-radiation, versus cisplatin-radiation alone, resulted in more frequent interruptions in radiation therapy (26.9% v 15.1%, respectively); similar cisplatin delivery (mean, 185.7 mg/m 2 v 191.1 mg/m 2, respectively); and more grade 3 to 4 radiation mucositis (43.2% v 33.3%, respectively), rash, fatigue, anorexia, and hypokalemia, but not more late toxicity. No differences were found between arms A and B in 30-day mortality (1.8% v 2.0%, respectively; P = .81), 3-year PFS (61.2% v 58.9%, respectively; P = .76), 3-year OS (72.9% v 75.8%, respectively; P = .32), locoregional failure (19.9% v 25.9%, respectively; P = .97), or distant metastasis (13.0% v 9.7%, respectively; P = .08). Patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), compared with patients with p16-negative OPC, had better 3-year probability of PFS (72.8% v 49.2%, respectively; P < .001) and OS (85.6% v 60.1%, respectively; P < .001), but tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression did not distinguish outcome. Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to radiation-cisplatin did not improve outcome and hence should not be prescribed routinely. PFS and OS were higher in patients with p16-positive OPC, but outcomes did not differ by EGFR expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation
Van Buuren, S., Brand, J. P. L., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. M., & Rubin, D. B. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/10629360600810434 · Cited by 1,217
Cited by
Gillison, M. L., Trotti, A. M., Harris, J., Eisbruch, A., Harari, P. M., Adelstein, D. J., Jordan, R. C. K., Zhao, W., Sturgis, E. M., Burtness, B., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32779-x · Cited by 1,304
Self-citationMachiels, J.-P., René Leemans, C., Golusinski, W., Grau, C., Licitra, L., & Gregoire, V. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.011 · Cited by 916
Opportunities and challenges of radiotherapy for treating cancer
Schaue, D., & McBride, W. H. (2015) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.120 · Cited by 784
Lee, N. Y., Ferris, R. L., Psyrri, A., Haddad, R. I., Tahara, M., Bourhis, J., Harrington, K., Chang, P. M.-H., Lin, J.-C., Razaq, M. A., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30737-3 · Cited by 661
Powell, S. F., Gold, K. A., Gitau, M. M., Sumey, C. J., Lohr, M. M., McGraw, S. C., Nowak, R. K., Jensen, A. W., Blanchard, M. J., Fischer, C. D., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.03156 · Cited by 116
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ang, K. K., Zhang, Q., Rosenthal, D. I., Nguyen-Tan, P. F., Sherman, E. J., Weber, R. S., Galvin, J. M., Bonner, J. A., Harris, J., El-Naggar, A. K., Gillison, M. L., Jordan, R. C., Konski, A. A., Thorstad, W. L., Trotti, A., Beitler, J. J., Garden, A. S., Spanos, W. J., Yom, S. S., & Axelrod, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2014-09-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 2940-2950
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2146488048
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 83.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab for Stage III to IV Head and Neck Carcinoma: RTOG 0522. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.53.5633
- The paper
- Ang, K. K., Zhang, Q., Rosenthal, D. I., Nguyen-Tan, P. F., Sherman, E. J., Weber, R. S., Galvin, J. M., Bonner, J. A., Harris, J., El-Naggar, A. K., Gillison, M. L., Jordan, R. C., Konski, A. A., Thorstad, W. L., Trotti, A., Beitler, J. J., Garden, A. S., Spanos, W. J., Yom, S. S., & Axelrod, R. S. (2014). Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab for Stage III to IV Head and Neck Carcinoma: RTOG 0522. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.53.5633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.