Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12

Open access
Crump, Michael, Kuruvilla, John, Couban, Stephen, MacDonald, David A., Kukreti, Vishal, Kouroukis, C. Tom, Rubinger, Morel, Buckstein, Rena, Imrie, Kevin R., Federico, Massimo, Di Renzo, Nicola, Howson-Jan, Kang, Baetz, Tara, Kaizer, Leonard, Voralia, Michael, Olney, Harold J., Turner, A. Robert, Sussman, Jonathan, Hay, Annette E., Djurfeldt, Marina S., Meyer, Ralph M., Chen, Bingshu E., Shepherd, Lois E.·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: For patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, we hypothesized that gemcitabine-based therapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is as effective as and less toxic than standard treatment. Patients and Methods: We randomly assigned 619 patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma to treatment with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) or to dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP). Patients with B-cell lymphoma also received rituximab. Responding patients proceeded to stem-cell collection and ASCT. Coprimary end points were response rate after two treatment cycles and transplantation rate. The noninferiority margin for the response rate to GDP relative to DHAP was set at 10%. Secondary end points included event-free and overall survival, treatment toxicity, and quality of life. Results: For the intention-to-treat population, the response rate with GDP was 45.2%; with DHAP the response rate was 44.0% (95% CI for difference, −9.0% to 6.7%), meeting protocol-defined criteria for noninferiority of GDP (P = .005). Similar results were obtained in a per-protocol analysis. The transplantation rates were 52.1% with GDP and 49.3% with DHAP (P = .44). At a median follow-up of 53 months, no differences were detected in event-free survival (HR, 0.99; stratified log-rank P = .95) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; P = .78) between GDP and DHAP. Treatment with GDP was associated with less toxicity (P < .001) and need for hospitalization (P < .001), and preserved quality of life (P = .04). Conclusion: For patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, in comparison with DHAP, treatment with GDP is associated with a noninferior response rate, similar transplantation rate, event-free survival, and overall survival, less toxicity and hospitalization, and superior quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.53.9593

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Crump, M., Kuruvilla, J., Couban, S., MacDonald, D. A., Kukreti, V., Kouroukis, C. T., Rubinger, M., Buckstein, R., Imrie, K. R., Federico, M., Di Renzo, N., Howson-Jan, K., Baetz, T., Kaizer, L., Voralia, M., Olney, H. J., Turner, A. R., Sussman, J., Hay, A. E., Djurfeldt, M. S., Meyer, R. M., Chen, B. E., & Shepherd, L. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-11-01
Volume
32
Issue
31
Pages
3490-3496
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2133345449
Cited by
462
References
3
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.53.9593
The paper
Crump, M., Kuruvilla, J., Couban, S., MacDonald, D. A., Kukreti, V., Kouroukis, C. T., Rubinger, M., Buckstein, R., Imrie, K. R., Federico, M., Di Renzo, N., Howson-Jan, K., Baetz, T., Kaizer, L., Voralia, M., Olney, H. J., Turner, A. R., Sussman, J., Hay, A. E., . . . Shepherd, L. E. (2014). Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.53.9593

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.