The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: For patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, we hypothesized that gemcitabine-based therapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is as effective as and less toxic than standard treatment. Patients and Methods: We randomly assigned 619 patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma to treatment with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) or to dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP). Patients with B-cell lymphoma also received rituximab. Responding patients proceeded to stem-cell collection and ASCT. Coprimary end points were response rate after two treatment cycles and transplantation rate. The noninferiority margin for the response rate to GDP relative to DHAP was set at 10%. Secondary end points included event-free and overall survival, treatment toxicity, and quality of life. Results: For the intention-to-treat population, the response rate with GDP was 45.2%; with DHAP the response rate was 44.0% (95% CI for difference, −9.0% to 6.7%), meeting protocol-defined criteria for noninferiority of GDP (P = .005). Similar results were obtained in a per-protocol analysis. The transplantation rates were 52.1% with GDP and 49.3% with DHAP (P = .44). At a median follow-up of 53 months, no differences were detected in event-free survival (HR, 0.99; stratified log-rank P = .95) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; P = .78) between GDP and DHAP. Treatment with GDP was associated with less toxicity (P < .001) and need for hospitalization (P < .001), and preserved quality of life (P = .04). Conclusion: For patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, in comparison with DHAP, treatment with GDP is associated with a noninferior response rate, similar transplantation rate, event-free survival, and overall survival, less toxicity and hospitalization, and superior quality of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718
Cited by
Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Schuster, S. J., Bishop, M. R., Tam, C. S., Waller, E. K., Borchmann, P., McGuirk, J. P., Jäger, U., Jaglowski, S., Andreadis, C., Westin, J. R., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1804980 · Cited by 4,112
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Locke, F. L., Miklos, D. B., Jacobson, C. A., Perales, M.-A., Kersten, M.-J., Oluwole, O. O., Ghobadi, A., Rapoport, A. P., McGuirk, J., Pagel, J. M., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2116133 · Cited by 1,607
Abramson, J. S., Solomon, S. R., Arnason, J., Johnston, P. B., Glass, B., Bachanova, V., Ibrahimi, S., Mielke, S., Mutsaers, P., Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., et al. (2023) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2022018730 · Cited by 399
Carpio, C., Bouabdallah, R., Ysebaert, L., Sancho, J.-M., Salles, G., Cordoba, R., Pinto, A., Gharibo, M., Rasco, D., Panizo, C., et al. (2020) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2019002395 · Cited by 72
Bachanova, V., Perales, M.-A., & Abramson, J. S. (2020) · Blood Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.blre.2019.100640 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Crump, M., Kuruvilla, J., Couban, S., MacDonald, D. A., Kukreti, V., Kouroukis, C. T., Rubinger, M., Buckstein, R., Imrie, K. R., Federico, M., Di Renzo, N., Howson-Jan, K., Baetz, T., Kaizer, L., Voralia, M., Olney, H. J., Turner, A. R., Sussman, J., Hay, A. E., Djurfeldt, M. S., Meyer, R. M., Chen, B. E., & Shepherd, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2014-11-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 3490-3496
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2133345449
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.53.9593
- The paper
- Crump, M., Kuruvilla, J., Couban, S., MacDonald, D. A., Kukreti, V., Kouroukis, C. T., Rubinger, M., Buckstein, R., Imrie, K. R., Federico, M., Di Renzo, N., Howson-Jan, K., Baetz, T., Kaizer, L., Voralia, M., Olney, H. J., Turner, A. R., Sussman, J., Hay, A. E., . . . Shepherd, L. E. (2014). Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.53.9593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.