Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Papillomavirus and Overall Survival After Progression of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Open access
Fakhry, Carole, Zhang, Qiang, Nguyen-Tan, Phuc Felix, Rosenthal, David, El-Naggar, Adel, Garden, Adam S., Soulieres, Denis, Trotti, Andy, Avizonis, Vilija, Ridge, John Andrew, Harris, Jonathan, Le, Quynh-Thu, Gillison, Maura·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Risk of cancer progression is reduced for patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) –positive oropharynx cancer (OPC) relative to HPV-negative OPC, but it is unknown whether risk of death after progression is similarly reduced. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage III-IV OPC enrolled onto Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials 0129 or RTOG 0522 who had known tumor p16 status plus local, regional, and/or distant progression after receiving platinum-based chemoradiotherapy were eligible for a retrospective analysis of the association between tumor p16 status and overall survival (OS) after disease progression. Rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank; hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by Cox models. Tests and models were stratified by treatment protocol. Results: A total of 181 patients with p16-positive (n = 105) or p16-negative (n = 76) OPC were included in the analysis. Patterns of failure and median time to progression (8.2 v 7.3 months; P = .67) were similar for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative tumors. After a median follow-up period of 4.0 years after disease progression, patients with p16-positive OPC had significantly improved survival rates compared with p16-negative patients (2-year OS, 54.6% v 27.6%; median, 2.6 v 0.8 years; P < .001). p16-positive tumor status (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.74) and receipt of salvage surgery (HR, 0.48; 95% CI; 0.27 to 0.84) reduced risk of death after disease progression whereas distant versus locoregional progression (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.09) increased risk, after adjustment for tumor stage and cigarette pack-years at enrollment. Conclusion: Tumor HPV status is a strong and independent predictor of OS after disease progression and should be a stratification factor for clinical trials for patients with recurrent or metastatic OPC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.55.1937

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Fakhry, C., Zhang, Q., Nguyen-Tan, P. F., Rosenthal, D., El-Naggar, A., Garden, A. S., Soulieres, D., Trotti, A., Avizonis, V., Ridge, J. A., Harris, J., Le, Q.-T., & Gillison, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-10-20
Volume
32
Issue
30
Pages
3365-3373
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2133539678
Cited by
550
References
3
FWCI
44.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Papillomavirus and Overall Survival After Progression of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.55.1937
The paper
Fakhry, C., Zhang, Q., Nguyen-Tan, P. F., Rosenthal, D., El-Naggar, A., Garden, A. S., Soulieres, D., Trotti, A., Avizonis, V., Ridge, J. A., Harris, J., Le, Q.-T., & Gillison, M. (2014). Human Papillomavirus and Overall Survival After Progression of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.55.1937

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.