The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Criteria for the Classification of Cancer-Associated Weight Loss
Abstract
Purpose: Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss (WL) in patients with cancer are unclear and heterogeneous and do not consider current trends toward obesity. Methods: Canadian and European patients with cancer (n = 8,160) formed a population-based data set. Body mass index (BMI) and percent WL (%WL) were recorded, and patients were observed prospectively until death. Data were entered into a multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, cancer site, stage, and performance status. Relationships for BMI and %WL to overall survival were examined to develop a grading system. Results: Mean overall %WL was −9.7% ± 8.4% and BMI was 24.4 ± 5.1 kg/m 2, and both %WL and BMI independently predicted survival (P < .01). Differences in survival were observed across five categories of BMI (< 20.0, 20.0 to 21.9, 22.0 to 24.9, 25.0 to 27.9, and ≥ 28.0 kg/m 2; P < .001) and five categories of %WL (−2.5% to −5.9%, −6.0% to −10.9%, −11.0% to −14.9%, ≥ −15.0%, and weight stable (± 2.4%); P < .001). A 5 × 5 matrix representing the five %WL categories within each of the five BMI categories was graded based on median survival and prognostic significance. Weight-stable patients with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 (grade 0) had the longest survival (20.9 months; 95% CI, 17.9 to 23.9 months), and %WL values associated with lowered categories of BMI were related to shorter survival (P < .001), as follows: grade 1, 14.6 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 16.2 months); grade 2, 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 11.9 months); grade 3, 7.6 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 8.2 months); and grade 4, 4.3 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 4.6 months). Survival discrimination by grade was observed within specific cancers, stages, ages, and performance status and in an independent validation sample (n = 2,963). Conclusion: A robust grading system incorporating the independent prognostic significance of both BMI and %WL was developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prado, C. M., Lieffers, J. R., McCargar, L. J., Reiman, T., Sawyer, M. B., Martin, L., & Baracos, V. E. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70153-0 · Cited by 3,238
Self-citationNguyen, D. M., & El-Serag, H. B. (2010) · Gastroenterology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2009.12.014 · Cited by 531
Cited by
ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients
Arends, J., Bachmann, P., Baracos, V., Barthelemy, N., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Fearon, K., Hütterer, E., Isenring, E., Kaasa, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015 · Cited by 3,114
Self-citationBaracos, V. E., Martin, L., Korc, M., Guttridge, D. C., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 · Cited by 1,738
Self-citationESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition
Arends, J., Baracos, V., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Calder, P. C., Deutz, N. E. P., Erickson, N., Laviano, A., Lisanti, M. P., Lobo, D. N., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citationPrevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: the PreMiO study
Muscaritoli, M., the PreMiO Study Group, Lucia, S., Farcomeni, A., Lorusso, V., Saracino, V., Barone, C., Plastino, F., Gori, S., Magarotto, R., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.20168 · Cited by 438
Ponsegromab for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia
Groarke, J. D., Crawford, J., Collins, S. M., Lubaczewski, S., Roeland, E. J., Naito, T., Hendifar, A. E., Fallon, M., Takayama, K., Asmis, T., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2409515 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, L., Senesse, P., Gioulbasanis, I., Antoun, S., Bozzetti, F., Deans, C., Strasser, F., Thoresen, L., Jagoe, R. T., Chasen, M., Lundholm, K., Bosaeus, I., Fearon, K. H., & Baracos, V. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-99
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2121911732
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Criteria for the Classification of Cancer-Associated Weight Loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.56.1894
- The paper
- Martin, L., Senesse, P., Gioulbasanis, I., Antoun, S., Bozzetti, F., Deans, C., Strasser, F., Thoresen, L., Jagoe, R. T., Chasen, M., Lundholm, K., Bosaeus, I., Fearon, K. H., & Baracos, V. E. (2015). Diagnostic Criteria for the Classification of Cancer-Associated Weight Loss. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.56.1894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.