Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliable Detection of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Colorectal Cancers Using Mutational Load in Next-Generation Sequencing Panels

Open access
Stadler, Zsofia K., Battaglin, Francesca, Middha, Sumit, Hechtman, Jaclyn F., Tran, Christina, Cercek, Andrea, Yaeger, Rona, Segal, Neil H., Varghese, Anna M., Reidy-Lagunes, Diane L., Kemeny, Nancy E., Salo-Mullen, Erin E., Ashraf, Asad, Weiser, Martin R., Garcia-Aguilar, Julio, Robson, Mark E., Offit, Kenneth, Arcila, Maria E., Berger, Michael F., Shia, Jinru, Solit, David B., Saltz, Leonard B.·2016·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Tumor screening for Lynch syndrome is recommended in all or most patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In metastatic CRC, sequencing of RAS/BRAF is necessary to guide clinical management. We hypothesized that a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel that identifies RAS/BRAF and other actionable mutations could also reliably identify tumors with DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMR-D) on the basis of increased mutational load. Methods: We identified all CRCs that underwent genomic mutation profiling with a custom NGS assay (MSK-IMPACT) between March 2014 and July 2015. Tumor mutational load, with exclusion of copy number changes, was determined for each case and compared with MMR status as determined by routine immunohistochemistry. Results: Tumors from 224 patients with unique CRC analyzed for MMR status also underwent MSK-IMPACT. Thirteen percent (n = 28) exhibited MMR-D by immunohistochemistry. Using the 341-gene assay, 100% of the 193 tumors with < 20 mutations were MMR-proficient. Of 31 tumors with ≥ 20 mutations, 28 (90%) were MMR-D. The three remaining tumors were easily identified as being distinct from the MMR-D tumors with > 150 mutations each. Each of these tumors harbored the P286R hotspot POLE mutation consistent with the ultramutator phenotype. Among MMR-D tumors, the median number of mutations was 50 (range, 20 to 90) compared with six (range, 0 to 17) in MMR-proficient/POLE wild-type tumors (P < .001). With a mutational load cutoff of ≥ 20 and < 150 for MMR-D detection, sensitivity and specificity were both 1.0 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.0). Conclusion: A cutoff for mutational load can be identified via multigene NGS tumor profiling, which provides a highly accurate means of screening for MMR-D in the same assay that is used for tumor genotyping.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2015.65.1067

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Stadler, Z. K., Battaglin, F., Middha, S., Hechtman, J. F., Tran, C., Cercek, A., Yaeger, R., Segal, N. H., Varghese, A. M., Reidy-Lagunes, D. L., Kemeny, N. E., Salo-Mullen, E. E., Ashraf, A., Weiser, M. R., Garcia-Aguilar, J., Robson, M. E., Offit, K., Arcila, M. E., Berger, M. F., Shia, J., Solit, D. B., & Saltz, L. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2016-06-20
Volume
34
Issue
18
Pages
2141-2147
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2318233342
Cited by
234
References
4
FWCI
32.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliable Detection of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Colorectal Cancers Using Mutational Load in Next-Generation Sequencing Panels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2015.65.1067
The paper
Stadler, Z. K., Battaglin, F., Middha, S., Hechtman, J. F., Tran, C., Cercek, A., Yaeger, R., Segal, N. H., Varghese, A. M., Reidy-Lagunes, D. L., Kemeny, N. E., Salo-Mullen, E. E., Ashraf, A., Weiser, M. R., Garcia-Aguilar, J., Robson, M. E., Offit, K., Arcila, M. E., Berger, M. F., . . . Saltz, L. B. (2016). Reliable Detection of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Colorectal Cancers Using Mutational Load in Next-Generation Sequencing Panels. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.65.1067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.