Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide or With Vorinostat in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Azacitidine is standard, first-line therapy in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Whether azacitidine-based combinations with lenalidomide or vorinostat produce superior overall response rates (ORRs) to azacitidine is not known. Patients and Methods: North American Intergroup Study S1117 is a phase II/III trial that randomly assigned patients with higher-risk MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) 1:1:1 to azacitidine (75 mg/m 2/day on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle); azacitidine plus lenalidomide (10 mg/day on days 1 to 21); or azacitidine plus vorinostat (300 mg twice daily on days 3 to 9). The primary phase II end point was improved ORR. Results: Of 277 patients from 90 centers, 92 received azacitidine, 93 received azacitidine plus lenalidomide, and 92 received azacitidine plus vorinostat. Median age was 70 years (range, 28 to 93 years), 85 patients (31%) were female, and 53 patients (19%) had CMML. Serious adverse events were similar across arms, although combination-arm patients were more likely to undergo nonprotocol-defined dose modifications ( P < .001).With a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 1 to 43 months), the ORR was 38% for patients receiving azacitidine, 49% for azacitidine plus lenalidomide ( P = .14 v azacitidine), and 27% for azacitidine plus vorinostat ( P = .16 v azacitidine). For patients with CMML, ORR was higher for azacitidine plus lenalidomide versus azacitidine (68% v 28%, P = .02) but similar for all arms across cytogenetic subgroups, as was remission duration and overall survival. ORR was higher with mutations in DNMT3A and lower for SRSF2, whereas ORR duration improved with fewer mutations. Lenalidomide dose reduction was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.30; P = .05). Conclusion: Patients with higher-risk MDS treated with azacitidine-based combinations had similar ORR to azacitidine monotherapy, although patients with CMML benefitted from azacitidine plus lenalidomide. The efficacy of combination regimens may have been affected by dose modifications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AZA alone continues to represent standard of care in MDS because all recent studies have failed to improve median OS compared to monotherapy.
“AZA alone continues to represent the standard of care in MDS because all recent studies have failed to improve the median OS compared to monotherapy.”
From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The Abstract identifies azacitidine as standard first-line therapy for higher-risk MDS. The Results (Overall Survival) report no statistically significant OS improvement with either combination tested, although median OS was numerically longer in both combination arms. This study does not establish that all recent studies failed to improve median OS, and its findings are limited to higher-risk MDS and CMML. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCombination therapies in MDS including HDAC inhibitors, lenalidomide, pevonedistat, and anthracyclines have not improved results.
“Combination therapies in this setting have included HDAC inhibitors, 33 , 34 , 35 lenalidomide, 36 pevonedistat, 37 and anthracyclines 38 all without improved results.”
From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 237
- Authors
- Sekeres, M. A., Othus, M., List, A. F., Odenike, O., Stone, R. M., Gore, S. D., Litzow, M. R., Buckstein, R., Fang, M., Roulston, D., Bloomfield, C. D., Moseley, A., Nazha, A., Zhang, Y., Velasco, M. R., Gaur, R., Atallah, E., Attar, E. C., Cook, E. K., Cull, A. H., Rauh, M. J., Appelbaum, F. R., & Erba, H. P.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- ORCID
- Sekeres, Mikkael A.
- Othus, Megan
- List, Alan F.
- Odenike, Olatoyosi
- Stone, Richard M.
- Gore, Steven D.
- Litzow, Mark R.
- Buckstein, Rena
- Fang, Min
- Bloomfield, Clara D.
- Moseley, Anna
- Nazha, Aziz
- Zhang, Yanming
- Velasco, Mario R.
- Gaur, Rakesh
- Atallah, Ehab
- Attar, Eyal C.
- Cook, Elina K.
- Cull, Alyssa H.
- Rauh, Michael J.
- Appelbaum, Frederick R.
- Erba, Harry P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-08-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2745-2753
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC5562170
- OpenAlex
- W2613190989
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 25.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Celgene
- European Hematology Association (TRTH44)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
- National Cancer Institute (UG1CA189821, U10CA180855, U10CA180820, U10CA180861, K12CA076917, P50CA140158, UG1CA189853, U10CA180888, UG1CA189830, UG1CA189954, U10CA180863, U10CA180819, UG1CA189804, UG1CA189971, U10CA180830, U10CA180801, UG1CA189856, UG1CA189860, U10CA180798, U10CA180818, U10CA180834, UG1CA189858, U10CA021115, UG1CA189972, U10CA180821, UG1CA180830, UG1CA189872)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Keywords
- azacitidine, lenalidomide, vorinostat, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, combination therapy, overall response rate, DNMT3A mutation, SRSF2 mutation, overall survival, remission duration, dose adjustment, adverse events, hypomethylating agents, histone deacetylase inhibitors
- MeSH terms
- Lenalidomide, Vorinostat, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Azacitidine, Humans, Hydroxamic Acids, Middle Aged, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Thalidomide, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review