The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 10 are not checked yet; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Association Between Plasma Genotyping and Outcomes of Treatment With Osimertinib (AZD9291) in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated potent activity against TKI resistance mediated by EGFR T790M. We studied whether noninvasive genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) is a useful biomarker for prediction of outcome from a third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib. Methods: Plasma was collected from all patients in the first-in-man study of osimertinib. Patients who were included had acquired EGFR-TKI resistance and evidence of a common EGFR-sensitizing mutation. Genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA was performed by using BEAMing. Plasma genotyping accuracy was assessed by using tumor genotyping from a central laboratory as reference. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in all T790M-positive or T790M-negative patients. Results: Sensitivity of plasma genotyping for detection of T790M was 70%. Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma of 18 (31%). ORR and median PFS were similar in patients with T790M-positive plasma (ORR, 63%; PFS, 9.7 months) or T790M-positive tumor (ORR, 62%; PFS, 9.7 months) results. Although patients with T790M-negative plasma had overall favorable outcomes (ORR, 46%; median PFS, 8.2 months), tumor genotyping distinguished a subset of patients positive for T790M who had better outcomes (ORR, 69%; PFS, 16.5 months) as well as a subset of patients negative for T790M with poor outcomes (ORR, 25%; PFS, 2.8 months). Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, patients positive for T790M in plasma have outcomes with osimertinib that are equivalent to patients positive by a tissue-based assay. This study suggests that, upon availability of validated plasma T790M assays, some patients could avoid a tumor biopsy for T790M genotyping. As a result of the 30% false-negative rate of plasma genotyping, those with T790M-negative plasma results still need a tumor biopsy to determine presence or absence of T790M.
Checked 2026-10-06 · 10 references not checked yet
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a retrospective analysis of the phase I AURA trial, patients with T790M detected in plasma by BEAMing had osimertinib outcomes similar to those with T790M detected in tumor tissue. Because plasma genotyping had a 30% false-negative rate for T790M, patients with T790M-negative plasma still needed tumor biopsy to determine T790M status.
Key findings
- Plasma genotyping sensitivity was 70% for T790M (111 of 158; 95% CI, 63% to 77%), 82% for exon 19 deletion (112 of 136; 95% CI, 75% to 88%), and 86% for L858R (63 of 73; 95% CI, 76% to 93%).
- Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma in 18 (31%); repeat testing with an alternative plasma assay confirmed T790M in 14 of 18 (78%).
- ORR and median PFS were similar for T790M-positive plasma (ORR, 63%; PFS, 9.7 months) and T790M-positive tumor (ORR, 62%; PFS, 9.7 months).
- Among patients with T790M-negative plasma, tumor genotyping distinguished T790M-positive tumors (ORR, 69%; PFS, 16.5 months) from T790M-negative tumors (ORR, 25%; PFS, 2.8 months).
Methods
- Post hoc/exploratory analysis of the phase I AURA study of osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC; 402 patients enrolled, 60 first-line patients excluded, 34 without a common EGFR-sensitizing mutation excluded, leaving 308 patients.
- Plasma cfDNA was collected before osimertinib and genotyped by BEAMing for T790M, L858R, and exon 19 deletion variants; positivity thresholds were ≥ 0.04% allelic fraction for exon 19 deletion or L858R and ≥ 0.06% for T790M; discordant plasma/tumor T790M results were retested with cobas plasma EGFR assay or ddPCR.
- Outcomes included confirmed ORR, maximum change in target lesion size, and PFS by RECIST version 1.1 per investigator; analyses used Clopper-Pearson exact CIs, Fisher’s exact or χ2 tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank tests.
Limitations
- The paper states the analysis was not preplanned, the study population was not fully representative of all acquired EGFR-TKI resistance because of intentional enrichment for T790M-positive patients, BEAMing was not performed under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments conditions, and prospective validation is needed.
- Evident from the text: this was a retrospective post hoc analysis, and some key subgroups were small, such as the 18 patients with T790M-positive plasma but T790M-negative tumor genotyping.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“T790M was detected in 80% of patients (110 of 137) with versus only 5% of patients (1 of 21) without a detectable EGFR-sensitizing mutation in plasma (P<.001, Fig A2B)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Plasma genotyping resulted in rare false positives for exon 19 deletions and L858R (specificity, 98% and 97%, respectively; Table 1, Appendix Fig A2C, online only)”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 148Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“sensitivity of plasma genotyping for the known sensitizing mutation was 82% for exon 19 deletions (112 of 136; 95% CI, 75% to 88%)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“sensitivity of plasma genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was significantly higher in patients with liver metastases (94% v 79%; P = .008)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 6.8 months; Appendix Fig A3, online only).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 69 patients with TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation detected in plasma (T790M negative/sens positive), ORR was 38% (26 of 69; 95% CI, 26% to 50%)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma of 18 (31%).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“T790M positivity was confirmed by using an alternative assay in 14 of 18 tested plasmas (78%)”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 21
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If plasma genotype is positive for T790M, this may obviate the need for a biopsy—this predicts for excellent outcomes on osimertinib (ORR, 63%; median PFS, 9.7 months), similar to that observed when treating with osimertinib on the basis of tumor genotyping results (ORR, 62%; median PFS, 9.7 months).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If plasma genotype is positive for T790M, this may obviate the need for a biopsy—this predicts for excellent outcomes on osimertinib (ORR, 63%; median PFS, 9.7 months), similar to that observed when treating with osimertinib on the basis of tumor genotyping results (ORR, 62%; median PFS, 9.7 months).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“median PFS was not significantly lower in those with T790M-negative plasma genotyping (8.2 months; 95% CI, 5.3 to 10.9 months; P = .188; Fig 3B).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, in 33 patients with no EGFR mutations detected (T790M negative/sens negative), ORR was higher at 64% (21 of 33; 95% CI, 45% to 79%; P = .019)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a 9.7-month median PFS (95% CI, 8.3 to 11.1 months; Fig 3B), which is similar to outcomes in patients positive for T790M on tumor biopsy.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ORR was surprisingly high at 46% (47 of 102; 95% CI, 36% to 56%) in patients with T790M-negative plasma genotyping; however, this was still lower than in patients with T790M-positive plasma (P = .011; Fig 2D)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and median PFS was longer at 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 17.9 months; P = .002; Appendix Fig A3)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ORR was 62% (108 of 173; 95% CI, 54% to 70%) in patients with T790M-positive tumors, higher than the 26% ORR (15 of 58; 95% CI, 15% to 39%; P < .001) in patients with T790M-negative tumors”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In patients with T790M-negative/sens-positive plasma genotyping, ORR to osimertinib was 38% and median PFS was 4.4 months.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of 164 patients from this study with T790M-positive plasma genotyping, 18 had T790M-negative tumor genotyping, presumably as a result of heterogeneous presence of resistance mutation as a minor clone, and these patients had a response rate of 28% (5 of 18) and median PFS of 4.2 months.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In patients with T790M-negative/sens-negative plasma results, high ORR and prolonged PFS was observed.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Standard of care is rapidly changing with the development of third-generation, mutant-selective EGFR-TKIs that have activity against cells that harbor TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations. Unlike conventional EGFR-TKIs, this activity is maintained in the presence of T790M resistance mutation.8,9”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our data suggest that plasma and tumor genotyping can have complementary roles for T790M testing, where plasma genotyping could be the initial step and a biopsy for tumor genotyping could be supplementary (Fig 5B).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This represents a clinical challenge because tumor genotyping for EGFR T790M requires a biopsy to be performed after resistance develops, which is a procedure that carries risks, can delay subsequent therapy, and may not always be feasible.18”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“At least five third-generation EGFR-TKIs are in clinical development (rociletinib, osimertinib, HM61713/BI1482694, ASP8273, and EGF816) and all have reported objective response rates (ORRs) that exceed 45% in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and T790M-positive resistance.12-16”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which suggests that heterogeneous presence of resistance mutations across disease sites, and not false-positives of the BEAMing assay, account for the majority of T790M tissue–plasma discordance.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Noninvasive genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) represents an attractive alternative for detection of EGFR T790M, noting that plasma genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations is an established alternative in Europe when tumor genotyping is not feasible.19”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Resistance to conventional EGFR-TKIs develops after a median of 10 to 12 months and is most commonly mediated by an acquired mutation, T790M1-5.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the ease and reduced risk of plasma analysis compared with an invasive biopsy procedure, data support a new paradigm for resistance management, with rapid plasma genotyping as a diagnostic option before undergoing a tumor biopsy.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas it is a large analysis of a prospective dataset, it was not a preplanned analysis, in part because of the rapid evolution of plasma genotyping technologies.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite this discordance, outcomes in patients with T790M-positive plasma are similar to outcomes of patients with T790M-positive tumors, which highlights that a single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the spatial heterogeneity of resistant lung cancer.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lastly, BEAMing was not performed under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments conditions; this analysis used an investigational assay that is identical to the commercially available BEAMing assay.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a setting in which it is unclear whether tumor genotyping is representative of the entirety of the disease, clinical outcome will be the best reference standard for development of a noninvasive assay.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients negative for T790M in plasma, however, should undergo a biopsy to determine T790M status because of the risks of false-negative plasma results.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the plasma T790M-negative population is a mixture of true and false negatives, biopsy to further investigate the presence of T790M-positive tumor tissue is warranted (Fig 5B).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this example, approximately 54% of resistant patients would be T790M positive in plasma and, if treated on the basis of that result, could potentially avoid a biopsy.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
“Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers and, therefore, a single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the entire resistant cancer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The BEAMing assay has negligible false positives for T790M.
“We found that 31% of patients who are negative for T790M on central tumor genotyping have detectable T790M in plasma with a BEAMing assay that otherwise has negligible false positives, though the relative AF of plasma T790M is lower in these patients than in patients with T790M-positive plasma and tumors.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Different median PFS values for the same subgroup
MinorFor patients with T790M-negative plasma but T790M-positive tumors, the Results report a median PFS of 16.5 months, while the Discussion reports 16.2 months.
“ORR was higher in patients with T790M-positive tumors (31 of 45; 69%; 95% CI, 53% to 82%) than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (10 of 40; 25%; 95% CI, 13% to 41%; P < .001), as was median PFS (16.5 months v 2.8 months; P < .001; Fig 3C).”
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Response-evaluable count presented as the plasma-positive cohort size
MinorThe Results say that 164 of the 271 plasma-genotyped patients were T790M positive, but Table A1 lists 167. The 164 figure is the denominator used for ORR, not the tabulated size of the plasma-positive cohort.
“Of 271 patients with plasma genotyping, 164 were positive for T790M in plasma and displayed a 63% ORR (103 of 164; 95% CI, 55% to 70%; Fig 2C)”
“Central (plasma) T790M mutation, No. (%) Positive 167 (54.2) 129 (54.4) 167 (61.6) 129 (59.7) Negative 104 (33.8) 87 (36.7) 104 (38.4) 87 (40.3)”
Incorrect percentage for the 80 mg tumor-genotyping subgroup
MinorTable A1 reports 90 patients at 80 mg among 237 patients with central tumor genotyping. That is 38.0%, not 40.0%.
Reported 40 · recomputed 37.974684
“Osimertinib dose, No. (%) 20 mg 21 (6.8) 13 (5.5) 21 (7.7) 13 (6.0) 40 mg 52 (16.9) 43 (18.1) 52 (19.2) 43 (20.0) 80 mg 126 (40.9) 90 (40.0) 108 (39.9) 88 (40.7)”
Citations
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261
Self-citationRosell, R., Carcereny, E., Gervais, R., Vergnenegre, A., Massuti, B., Felip, E., Palmero, R., Garcia-Gomez, R., Pallares, C., Sanchez, J. M., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70393-x · Cited by 5,489
Genotypic and Histological Evolution of Lung Cancers Acquiring Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors
Sequist, L. V., Waltman, B. A., Dias-Santagata, D., Digumarthy, S., Turke, A. B., Fidias, P., Bergethon, K., Shaw, A. T., Gettinger, S., Cosper, A. K., et al. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003 · Cited by 3,499
Sequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228
Self-citationCross, D. A. E., Ashton, S. E., Ghiorghiu, S., Eberlein, C., Nebhan, C. A., Spitzler, P. J., Orme, J. P., Finlay, M. R. V., Ward, R. A., Mellor, M. J., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0337 · Cited by 2,246
Self-citationAZD9291 in EGFR Inhibitor–Resistant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Jänne, P. A., Yang, J. C.-H., Kim, D.-W., Planchard, D., Ohe, Y., Ramalingam, S. S., Ahn, M.-J., Kim, S.-W., Su, W.-C., Horn, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411817 · Cited by 2,116
Self-citationNovel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M
Zhou, W., Ercan, D., Chen, L., Yun, C.-H., Li, D., Capelletti, M., Cortot, A. B., Chirieac, L., Iacob, R. E., Padera, R., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08622 · Cited by 1,013
Oxnard, G. R., Paweletz, C. P., Kuang, Y., Mach, S. L., O'Connell, A., Messineo, M. M., Luke, J. J., Butaney, M., Kirschmeier, P., Jackman, D. M., et al. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2482 · Cited by 786
Self-citationRociletinib in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sequist, L. V., Soria, J.-C., Goldman, J. W., Wakelee, H. A., Gadgeel, S. M., Varga, A., Papadimitrakopoulou, V., Solomon, B. J., Oxnard, G. R., Dziadziuszko, R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1413654 · Cited by 665
Self-citationFinlay, M. R. V., Anderton, M., Ashton, S., Ballard, P., Bethel, P. A., Box, M. R., Bradbury, R. H., Brown, S. J., Butterworth, S., Campbell, A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500973a · Cited by 636
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 851
Pisapia, P., Bellevicine, C., Malapelle, U., Luca, C. D., Vigliar, E., & Troncone, G. (2019) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.22118 · Cited by 5
Dong, Y. Q., Li, Q., Miao, Q., & Li, D. (2021) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000026450 · Cited by 5
Şahin, İ., Saat, H., Aksoy, S., Dızdar, Ö., Erdem, H. B., & Bahsi, T. (2021) · Molecular and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.3892/mco.2021.2434 · Cited by 5
Wan, Y., Xu, F., & Wang, J. (2022) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr-22-1671 · Cited by 5
Ma, J., Tan, S. H., Yin, D. X. C., Tran, N. T. A., Tan, G. S., Lai, G. G. Y., Ang, M., Kanesvaran, R., Jain, A., Rajasekaran, T., et al. (2023) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr-22-661 · Cited by 5
„Liquid biopsy“: Analyse molekularer Marker aus Blutproben zur Therapiesteuerung beim Lungenkarzinom
Brueckl, W. M., Wirtz, R. M., Bertsch, T., Ficker, J. H., & Jung, A. (2017) · Pneumologie · doi:10.1055/s-0042-123803 · Cited by 5
Koba, H., Kimura, H., Yoneda, T., Sone, T., Ohkura, N., Hara, J., Hosomichi, K., Tajima, A., & Kasahara, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87094-1 · Cited by 5
Molecular biomarkers and liquid biopsies in lung cancer
Sankar, K. N., Zeinali, M., Nagrath, S., & Ramnath, N. (2022) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.007 · Cited by 5
Lupini, L., Roncarati, R., Belluomini, L., Lancia, F., Bassi, C., D’Abundo, L., Michilli, A., Guerriero, P., Fasano, A., Tiberi, E., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23158546 · Cited by 5
Assi, H. I., Tfayli, A., Assaf, N., Daya, S. A., Bidikian, A., Kawsarani, D., Fermanian, P., Zaatari, G. S., & Mahfouz, R. A. (2019) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-019-04797-5 · Cited by 5
Schmid, S., Stewart, E., Martins-Filho, S. N., Cabanero, M., Wang, A., Bao, H., Wu, X., Patel, D., Chen, Z., Law, J. H., et al. (2020) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.009 · Cited by 5
Billaud, A., Verrièle, V., Dauvé, J., Chevalier, L.-M., & Morel, A. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10080527 · Cited by 5
Kwok, W. C., Ho, J., Lam, D. C. L., Lui, M. M., Ip, M., & Tam, T. C. C. (2019) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1111/ajco.13287 · Cited by 5
A Case-control Study Supporting the Use of Liquid Biopsy in the Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer
Dai, L., Wang, C., & Ding, Z. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.7.1761 · Cited by 4
Primary resistance to osimertinib despite acquired T790M
Chang, L., Chang, Y., & Shih, J. (2020) · Respirology Case Reports · doi:10.1002/rcr2.532 · Cited by 4
Circulating tumor DNA in non-small-cell lung cancer: A step beyond blood
Addeo, A., & Friedlaender, A. (2020) · Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_276_20 · Cited by 4
The evolving paradigm of precision medicine in lung cancer
Passiglia, F., & Scagliotti, G. V. (2021) · Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1097/mcp.0000000000000778 · Cited by 5
Prabhash, K., & Batra, U. (2021) · Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_169_21 · Cited by 4
Hou, T., Zeng, J., Xu, H., Su, S., Ye, J., & Li, Y. (2022) · Molecular and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.3892/mco.2022.2521 · Cited by 4
Schüler, M., Hense, J., Darwiche, K., Michels, S. Y. F., Hautzel, H., Kobe, C., Lueong, S., Metzenmacher, M., Herold, T., Zaun, G., et al. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.123.266979 · Cited by 4
Hsu, P., Chang, J. W., Chiu, L., Yang, C., Kuo, C. S., Fang, Y., & Wu, C. (2024) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-024-03727-7 · Cited by 4
Okuma, Y., & Hosomi, Y. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.03.26 · Cited by 4
De novo activating epidermal growth factor mutations ( EGFR ) in small‐cell lung cancer
Thai, A. A., Chia, P. L., Russell, P. A., Do, H., Dobrovic, A., Mitchell, P. L. R., & John, T. (2017) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/imj.13531 · Cited by 4
Guerini‐Rocco, E., Passaro, A., Casadio, C., Luca, V. M. D., Guarize, J., de Marinis, F., Vacirca, D., & Barberis, M. C. P. (2018) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-0158-ra · Cited by 4
SPACEWALK: A Remote Participation Study of ALK Resistance Leveraging Plasma Cell-Free DNA Genotyping
Lawrence, M. N., Tamen, R. M., Martínez, P., Sable-Hunt, A. L., Addario, T., Barbour, P., Shaffer, T. S., Hosseini, S. A., Bertucci, C., Lim, L. P., et al. (2021) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100151 · Cited by 4
Self-citationIkeda, M., Koh, Y., Oyanagi, J., Teraoka, S., Ishige, M., Fujimura, Y., Takeda, K., Tokudome, N., Ozawa, Y., UEDA, H., et al. (2021) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.15499 · Cited by 4
Kim, Y. J., Ji, W., Lee, J.-C., Chun, S., & Choi, C. (2022) · Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.4143/crt.2021.857 · Cited by 4
Liquid biopsy in lung cancer management
Zamfir, M.-A. I., Buburuzan, L., Hudiță, A., Gălățeanu, B., Ginghină, O., Ion, D., Motaș, N., Ardeleanu, C. M., & Costache, M. (2022) · Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology · doi:10.47162/rjme.63.1.02 · Cited by 4
Fernandes, G., Vilariça, A. S., Fernandes, B., Camacho, C., Saraiva, C., Estevinho, F., Bastos, H. N., Lopes, J. M., Fidalgo, P., Garrido, P., et al. (2023) · Pulmonology · doi:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.11.009 · Cited by 4
Molecular Diagnosis and Targeting for Lung Cancer
Yoneda, K., & Tanaka, F. (2017) · Current human cell research and applications · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6469-2_1 · Cited by 4
Mistry, R. C., & Patil, A. S. (2017) · Indian Journal of Cancer · doi:10.4103/ijc.ijc_545_17 · Cited by 4
State of the Art and Future Direction for the Analysis of Cell-Free Circulating DNA
Heliebi, A. E., & Heitzer, E. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814470-1.00005-8 · Cited by 4
Chen, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Hu, M., Zhang, W., & Han, B. (2020) · Targeted Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11523-020-00724-y · Cited by 4
Nishii, K., Ohashi, K., Tamura, T., Ninomiya, K., Matsubara, T., Senoo, S., Kano, H., Watanabe, H., Oda, N., Makimoto, G., et al. (2020) · Oncology Letters · doi:10.3892/ol.2020.12256 · Cited by 4
The Introduction and Clinical Application of Cell-Free Tumor DNA
Li, J., Liu, R., Huang, C., Chen, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_4 · Cited by 4
Circulating-free tumour DNA and the promise of disease phenotyping in hepatocellular carcinoma
Pinato, D. J. (2018) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0262-8 · Cited by 4
Park, C., Lee, S. Y., Lee, J. C., Choi, C., Lee, S. Y., Jang, T. W., Oh, I., & Kim, Y. (2020) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13763 · Cited by 4
Casas, C. M. D. L., Garzón‐Ibáñez, M., Jordana‐Ariza, N., Viteri, S., Moya‐Horno, I., Karachaliou, N., Yeste, Z., Campos, R., Villatoro, S., Balada‐Bel, A., et al. (2018) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2018.10.12 · Cited by 4
Advancing quality-control for NGS measurement of actionable mutations in circulating tumor DNAPreprint
Willey, J. C., Morrison, T., Austermiller, B., Crawford, E. L., Craig, D. J., Blomquist, T. M., Jones, W. D., Wali, A., Lococo, J. S., Haseley, N., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.04.06.438497 · Cited by 4
Zhen, C., Dong, J., Lu, H., Huang, C., Li, S., Lin, Y., Chen, Y.-T., Wang, Y., Mo, Y., Yang, Z., et al. (2025) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.71302 · Cited by 3
da Silva, M. C. E., de Campos, V. S., da Silva, M. P. A. D. V., & Ferrer, V. P. (2025) · ONCOLOGIE · doi:10.1515/oncologie-2025-0281 · Cited by 3
More, V., Lu, L., Ding, Z., Ding, Z., Xi, Z., Mizia, S., & Guo, N. (2026) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-025-01265-1 · Cited by 5
Empfehlung der Sektionen 2 und 11 der DGP zur Rebiopsie bei Lungenkarzinomen
Brückl, W. M., Ficker, J. H., Tiemann, M., Schumann, C., Reinmuth, N., Heigener, D. F., Schütte, W., Eberhardt, R., Darwiche, K., & Wagner, M. (2018) · Pneumologie · doi:10.1055/a-0632-9174 · Cited by 3
Molecular testing in non-small cell lung cancer: A consensus recommendation
Lai, G. G. Y., Cheng, X. M., Ang, Y. L. E., Chua, K. L. M., Samol, J., Soo, R. A., Tan, D. S. W., Lim, T. K. H., & Lim, W. (2023) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022473 · Cited by 3
The “liquid biopsy” in non-small cell lung cancer—not quite ready for prime time use
Qin, A., & Ramnath, N. (2016) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2016.10.29 · Cited by 3
Auvray, M., Benderra, M., Bretagne, M., Faouzi, S., Lebellec, L., Majhoubi, L., Saint‐Ghislain, M., & Vignot, S. (2017) · Bulletin du Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.06.010 · Cited by 3
Taus, Á., Camacho, L., Rocha, P., Hernández, A., Longarón, R., Clavé, S., Fernández‐Ibarrondo, L., Salido, M., Hardy-Werbin, M., Fernández‐Rodríguez, C., et al. (2020) · Archivos de Bronconeumología · doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2020.01.023 · Cited by 3
Osimertinib for Leptomeningeal Disease in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
Hegde, A. M., & Velcheti, V. (2020) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.016 · Cited by 3
Use of liquid biopsy in monitoring therapeutic resistance in EGFR oncogene addicted NSCLC
Iacovino, M. L., Ciaramella, V., Paragliola, F., Suarato, G., Busiello, G., & Sparano, F. (2020) · Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy · doi:10.37349/etat.2020.00024 · Cited by 3
Pan, G., Chen, K., Yu, X., Sheng, J., & Fan, Y. (2021) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr-21-223 · Cited by 3
Malapelle, U., Fusco, N., Pisapia, P., & Pagni, F. (2020) · EMJ Oncology · doi:10.33590/emjoncol/19-00107 · Cited by 3
Jin, J., He, J., Yan, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhuang, K., Wen, Y., & Gao, J. (2022) · PubMed Central · Cited by 3
Targeting EGFR Mutation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges and Future Perspectives
Haddad, F., Kourié, H. R., & Kattan, J. G. (2016) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2016-0325 · Cited by 3
Circulating DNA in Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis
Vietsch, E. E., & Wellstein, A. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811785-9.00014-4 · Cited by 3
Arrieta, O. G., Hernandez‐Martinez, J., Montes-Servín, E., Heredia, D., Cardona, A. F., Molina-Romero, C., Lara‐Mejía, L., Díaz-García, D. A., Bahena-González, A., & Mendoza-Oliva, D. L. (2021) · Cancer Biomarkers · doi:10.3233/cbm-203164 · Cited by 3
Highly sensitive detection of driver mutations from cytological samples and cfDNA in lung cancer
Fujita, K., Nakayama, M., Sata, M., Nagai, Y., Hisata, S., Mato, N., Suzuki, T., Bando, M., Hizawa, N., & Hagiwara, K. (2021) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.4330 · Cited by 2
Taus, Á., Camacho, L., Rocha, P., Hernández, A., Longarón, R., Clavé, S., Fernández‐Ibarrondo, L., Salido, M., Hardy-Werbin, M., Fernández‐Rodríguez, C., et al. (2021) · Archivos de Bronconeumología · doi:10.1016/j.arbr.2020.01.013 · Cited by 3
Will liquid biopsies become our fluid transition to personalized immunotherapy?
Wauters, E., & Vansteenkiste, J. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx751 · Cited by 3
DNA shedding in non-small-cell lung cancer: useful to assess?
Suda, K. (2017) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30479-4 · Cited by 3
Mazzarella, L. (2018) · ecancermedicalscience · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2018.817 · Cited by 3
Heterogeneity‐based, multiple mechanisms in the resistance to osimertinib (AZD9291): A case report
Liu, Y., Hao, X., Hu, X., Li, J., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Xing, P., Li, W., Ying, J., Han, X., et al. (2018) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12596 · Cited by 3
Monitoring EGFR TKI resistance in real time using ddPCR-based liquid biopsy: a case report
Sorber, L., Zwaenepoel, K., Wouters, A., Janssens, A., Hiddinga, B. I., van Meerbeeck, J. P., Lardon, F., Pauwels, P., & Rolfo, C. D. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205210 · Cited by 3
Granados, A. L. O., Artal, A., Aguiar‐Bujanda, D., Oramás, J., Fírvida, J. L., de Castro, J., Fuentes, J. C., Gordo, R., Galán, R., Trigo, J. M., et al. (2019) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.13244 · Cited by 3
Colinet, B., van Meerbeeck, J. P., Cuppens, T., & Vansteenkiste, J. (2020) · Acta Clinica Belgica · doi:10.1080/17843286.2019.1708125 · Cited by 3
Molecular diagnostics in oncology: new trends
Имянитов, Е. Н. (2020) · Medical academic journal · doi:10.17816/maj19281 · Cited by 3
Mitsumura, T., Kumaki, Y., Takahashi, K., Matsudera, S., Sakakibara, R., Honda, T., Ishizuka, M., Iijima, Y., Shirai, T., Okamoto, T., et al. (2021) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.14098 · Cited by 2
Yuan, C., Jiang, H., Jiang, W., Wang, H., Su, C., & Zhou, S. (2021) · Cancer Management and Research · doi:10.2147/cmar.s329900 · Cited by 3
Liquid biopsy for T790M mutation detection: A ray of hope?
Mohan, A., & Mittal, S. (2019) · Lung India · doi:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_543_19 · Cited by 3
Differential prognostic value of tumor and plasma T790M mutations in EGFR TKI-treated advanced NSCLC
Tung, P., Chiu, T.-H., Huang, A. C., Ju, J., Huang, C., Wang, C., Ko, H., Chung, F., Hsu, P., Fang, Y., et al. (2024) · Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology · doi:10.1177/17588359231222604 · Cited by 2
Lim, S., Lee, K. S., Won, D., Seo, S. H., Lee, S., Choi, J. R., Seo, J., & Shin, S. (2025) · Annals of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.3343/alm.2025.0171 · Cited by 2
Microfluidic biosensors and devices for brain tumor diagnosis and monitoring
Allela, O. Q. B., Alkhazali, W. H., Arora, V., Prahlad, P., Mohanty, B., Dhyani, A., Uppal, S., Aliev, M. A., Sameer, H. N., Yaseen, A., et al. (2025) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2025.120796 · Cited by 2
Regulated cell death plasticity in cancer: thresholds, reversibility, and therapeutic failure
Jawwad, T., Baba, S. K., Surendranath, A., Chaudhary, E., Jeelani, G., Akil, A. S. A.-S., Menhali, A. A., Bhat, A. A., & Mirza, S. (2026) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-026-08584-2 · Cited by 2
Osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: how to select patients and when to treat
Zugazagoitia, J., Ferrer, I., & Paz-Ares, L. G. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30506-x · Cited by 2
A Case of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Diagnosed Through Identification of an IDH1 Mutation
Kamath, S. D., Lin, X., & Kalyan, A. (2018) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0210 · Cited by 2
Biomarkers of Lung Cancer: Liquid Biopsy Comes of Age
Miyanaga, A., Masuda, M., & Yamada, T. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7295-7_10 · Cited by 2
Required Evidence for Clinical Applications of Liquid Biopsy Using Especially CTCs in Lung Cancer
Tamminga, M., & Groen, H. J. M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10113704 · Cited by 2
Chan, O. S. H., Lee, V. H.-F., Nyaw, S. F., Kam, T. Y., Lee, K., & Lam, K. C. (2021) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2021.01.011 · Cited by 2
Liao, P.-Y., Ou, W.-F., Su, K., Sun, M.-H., Huang, C.-M., Chen, K., Hsu, K.-H., Yu, S., Huang, Y.-H., Tseng, J., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14122824 · Cited by 2
Tang, N., Li, Z., Han, X., Zhao, C., Guo, J., & Wang, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.891938 · Cited by 2
Liquid biopsies in lung cancer—a narrative review
Gahan, P. B., & Schwarzenbach, H. (2022) · ExRNA · doi:10.21037/exrna-22-16 · Cited by 1
Miller, A. R., Shah, T., Strawser, C., Rivaldi, A., Wilson, S. A., Zhong, H., Lucyshyn, J. M., Garfinkle, E. A. R., McCoy, M., Cummins, S., et al. (2025) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-025-14711-x · Cited by 2
Lewandowska, M. A., Nalejska, E., Żołna, Ł., Chrząstek, A., Żurawski, B. A., Wiśniewska, M., Las‐Jankowska, M., Roszkowski, K., & Kowalewski, J. (2019) · Współczesna Onkologia · doi:10.5114/wo.2019.85879 · Cited by 2
The Role of Liquid Biopsies in Lung Cancer Screening
Dagogo‐Jack, I., Sequist, L. V. D., & Piotrowska, Z. (2017) · Seminars in Roentgenology · doi:10.1053/j.ro.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2
Griesinger, F., Radke, S., Lüers, A., Deschler-Baier, B., Kimmich, M., Sebastian, M., Schulz, C. K. J., Brugger, W., Wiewrodt, R. G., Pirker, R., et al. (2018) · Pneumologie · doi:10.1055/a-0647-9835 · Cited by 2
The Implication of Liquid Biopsy in the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Potential and Expectation
Ren, J., & Liu, R. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3346-5_10 · Cited by 3
Verlicchi, A., Canale, M., Chiadini, E., Cravero, P., Urbini, M., Andrikou, K., Pasini, L., Flospergher, M., Burgio, M. A., Crinò, L., et al. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13091915 · Cited by 2
Liao, B.-C., Hsu, W., Lee, J., Yang, C., Tsai, T.-H., Liao, W., Ho, C., Lin, C., Shih, J., Yu, C., et al. (2020) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100099 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCadranel, J. L., Fallet, V., Baldacci, S., & Cortot, A. B. (2020) · Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités · doi:10.1016/s1877-1203(20)30100-2 · Cited by 2
Zhou, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Dai, H., & Guo, S. (2021) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2021-0064 · Cited by 2
Wang, C., Lai, C., Chang, Y., Chang, H., Tseng, C., Huang, K., & Lin, M. (2021) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.14198 · Cited by 2
Alegre, E., Martínez, D., Macías, M., & González, Á. (2016) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2016.11.70 · Cited by 1
[Common attitudes about the effect of positive and negative mood on task related motivation].
Abele, A. E. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Rey-López, J. P., Lumbreras, B., Ponce, J., Campillo-Artero, C., & Pastor‐Valero, M. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819178-1.00038-1 · Cited by 1
Álvarez-Alegret, R., Rojo, F., Garrido, P., Bellosillo, B., Rodríguez-Lescure, Á., Rodríguez‐Peralto, J. L., Vera, R., de Álava, E., García‐Campelo, R., & Remón, J. (2020) · Revista Española de Patología · doi:10.1016/j.patol.2019.12.001 · Cited by 1
Castiglia, M., Incorvaia, L., Gristina, V., Malapelle, U., Bazan, V., Rolfo, C. D., & Russo, A. D. (2021) · UNIPA Springer series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56051-5_6 · Cited by 1
Milecki, T., Kluzek, K., Pstrąg, N., Antczak, A., Cieślikowski, W. A., Wichtowski, M., Kuncman, Ł., Kwias, Z., & Wesoły, J. (2023) · Współczesna Onkologia · doi:10.5114/wo.2023.135366 · Cited by 1
Hu, Y., Narayan, A., Xu, Y., Wolfe, J., Vu, D., Trinh, T., Kantak, C., Ivy, S. P., Eder, J. P., Deng, Y., et al. (2024) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.23.00289 · Cited by 2
Biópsia Líquida: Atualização de Tema
de Oliveira, D., & Vieira, T. A. (2024) · Revista Científica Hospital Santa Izabel · doi:10.35753/rchsi.v8i1.510 · Cited by 1
Expanding role of cell-free DNA for the early diagnosis and monitoring of pulmonary diseases
Yang, L., Gu, Y., Shao, J., Lf, Z., & Wang, C. (2026) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000003955 · Cited by 2
Genomic Applications in Pulmonary Malignancies
Büttner, R., Odenthal, M., & Merkelbach‐Bruse, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0727-4_24 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Oxnard, G. R., Thress, K. S., Alden, R. S., Lawrance, R., Paweletz, C. P., Cantarini, M., Yang, J. C.-H., Barrett, J. C., & Jänne, P. A.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Ryan S. Alden, Cloud P. Paweletz, and Pasi A. Jänne, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Kenneth S. Thress and J. Carl Barrett, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA; Rachael Lawrance and Mireille Cantarini, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and James Chih-Hsin Yang, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 3375-3382
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC5035123
- OpenAlex
- W2468983064
- Semantic Scholar
- 120643ae96c264f871673844d9f7ad68e25ce532
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 151 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 18
- FWCI
- 130.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA135257, U01CA210171)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- osimertinib, T790M mutation, liquid biopsy, plasma cell-free DNA, beaming, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer, treatment response prediction, false negative rate, tumor biopsy, progression-free survival, objective response rate, first-in-man trial
- MeSH terms
- Acrylamides, Aniline Compounds, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DNA, Neoplasm, Genotype, Humans, Indoles, Lung Neoplasms, Piperazines, Pyrimidines, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
