Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved Outcomes With Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide Compared With Retinoic Acid and Chemotherapy in Non–High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Final Results of the Randomized Italian-German APL0406 Trial

Open access
Platzbecker, Uwe, Avvisati, Giuseppe, Cicconi, Laura, Thiede, Christian, Paoloni, Francesca, Vignetti, Marco, Ferrara, Felicetto, Divona, Mariadomenica, Albano, Francesco, Efficace, Fabio, Fazi, Paola, Sborgia, Marco, Di Bona, Eros, Breccia, Massimo, Borlenghi, Erika, Cairoli, Roberto, Rambaldi, Alessandro, Melillo, Lorella, La Nasa, Giorgio, Fiedler, Walter, Brossart, Peter, Hertenstein, Bernd, Salih, Helmut R., Wattad, Mohammed, Lübbert, Michael, Brandts, Christian H., Hänel, Mathias, Röllig, Christoph, Schmitz, Norbert, Link, Hartmut, Frairia, Chiara, Pogliani, Enrico Maria, Fozza, Claudio, D’Arco, Alfonso Maria, Di Renzo, Nicola, Cortelezzi, Agostino, Fabbiano, Francesco, Döhner, Konstanze, Ganser, Arnold, Döhner, Hartmut, Amadori, Sergio, Mandelli, Franco, Ehninger, Gerhard, Schlenk, Richard F., Lo-Coco, Francesco·2017·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The initial results of the APL0406 trial showed that the combination of all- trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in first-line therapy of low- or intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). We herein report the final analysis on the complete series of patients enrolled onto this trial. Patients and Methods: The APL0406 study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III noninferiority trial. Eligible patients were adults between 18 and 71 years of age with newly diagnosed, low- or intermediate-risk APL (WBC at diagnosis ≤ 10 × 10 9 /L). Overall, 276 patients were randomly assigned to receive ATRA-ATO or ATRA-CHT between October 2007 and January 2013. Results: Of 263 patients evaluable for response to induction, 127 (100%) of 127 patients and 132 (97%) of 136 patients achieved complete remission (CR) in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT arms, respectively ( P = .12). After a median follow-up of 40.6 months, the event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival at 50 months for patients in the ATRA-ATO versus ATRA-CHT arms were 97.3% v 80%, 1.9% v 13.9%, and 99.2% v 92.6%, respectively ( P < .001, P = .0013, and P = .0073, respectively). Postinduction events included two relapses and one death in CR in the ATRA-ATO arm and two instances of molecular resistance after third consolidation, 15 relapses, and five deaths in CR in the ATRA-CHT arm. Two patients in the ATRA-CHT arm developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Conclusion: These results show that the advantages of ATRA-ATO over ATRA-CHT increase over time and that there is significantly greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATO-ATRA compared with ATRA-CHT in low- and intermediate-risk APL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2016.67.1982

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Platzbecker, U., Avvisati, G., Cicconi, L., Thiede, C., Paoloni, F., Vignetti, M., Ferrara, F., Divona, M., Albano, F., Efficace, F., Fazi, P., Sborgia, M., Di Bona, E., Breccia, M., Borlenghi, E., Cairoli, R., Rambaldi, A., Melillo, L., La Nasa, G., Fiedler, W., Brossart, P., Hertenstein, B., Salih, H. R., Wattad, M., Lübbert, M., Brandts, C. H., Hänel, M., Röllig, C., Schmitz, N., Link, H., Frairia, C., Pogliani, E. M., Fozza, C., D’Arco, A. M., Di Renzo, N., Cortelezzi, A., Fabbiano, F., Döhner, K., Ganser, A., Döhner, H., Amadori, S., Mandelli, F., Ehninger, G., Schlenk, R. F., & Lo-Coco, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2017-02-20
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
605-612
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2474389367
Cited by
389
References
22
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Outcomes With Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide Compared With Retinoic Acid and Chemotherapy in Non–High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Final Results of the Randomized Italian-German APL0406 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.67.1982
The paper
Platzbecker, U., Avvisati, G., Cicconi, L., Thiede, C., Paoloni, F., Vignetti, M., Ferrara, F., Divona, M., Albano, F., Efficace, F., Fazi, P., Sborgia, M., Di Bona, E., Breccia, M., Borlenghi, E., Cairoli, R., Rambaldi, A., Melillo, L., La Nasa, G., . . . Lo-Coco, F. (2017). Improved Outcomes With Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide Compared With Retinoic Acid and Chemotherapy in Non–High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Final Results of the Randomized Italian-German APL0406 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.67.1982

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.