Pomalidomide for Symptomatic Kaposi's Sarcoma in People With and Without HIV Infection: A Phase I/II Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a multicentric tumor caused by Kaposi's sarcoma–associated herpesvirus. Unmet needs include therapies that are oral, anthracycline sparing, and deliverable in resource-limited settings. We evaluated pomalidomide, an oral immune modulatory agent, in patients with symptomatic KS. Methods: The primary objectives were to assess tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and activity. Initial dosage level was 5 mg once per day for 21 days per 28-day cycle, with a de-escalated level of 3 mg if not tolerable, and aspirin 81 mg once per day thromboprophylaxis. HIV-infected patients required controlled viremia with either persistent KS despite 3 months of antiretroviral therapy (ART) or progressive KS despite 2 months of ART. Evaluations included tumor response and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Results: Twenty-two patients were treated; 15 (68%) were HIV infected, 17 (77%) had advanced (T1) disease, and 17 (77%) previous KS therapy excluding ART. All were treated with 5 mg because no dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Over 156 cycles, the grade 3/4 adverse events possibly attributable to therapy were neutropenia (23 cycles, 10 patients), infection (1 cycle), and edema (1 cycle). Sixteen patients responded (73%; 95% CI, 50% to 89%): nine of 15 HIV-infected patients (60%; 95% CI, 32% to 84%) and all seven HIV-uninfected patients (100%; 95% CI, 59% to 100%). Median time to response was 4 weeks (range, 4 to 36 weeks). HRQL showed no impairment during therapy and improved satisfaction with appearance at end therapy ( P = .03). Significant increases in CD4 + and CD8 + cells were seen in patients with and without HIV, together with a transient increase in Kaposi's sarcoma–associated herpesvirus viral load at week 4 ( P = .05). Conclusion: Pomalidomide is well tolerated and active in KS regardless of HIV status. Responses were rapid, with improved self-reported outcomes, and occurred in advanced and heavily pretreated disease. Correlative studies support, at least in part, an immunologic mechanism of activity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Responses to lenalidomide were seen even in patients who had disease progression on prior thalidomide therapy, and the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with one or more prior lines of therapy was FDA approved in 2006.
“Again, responses were seen even in patients who had disease progression on prior thalidomide therapy and the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with one or more prior lines of therapy was FDA approved in 200624,25.”
From Cancer therapies based on targeted protein degradation — lessons learned with lenalidomide (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Polizzotto, M. N., Uldrick, T. S., Wyvill, K. M., Aleman, K., Peer, C. J., Bevans, M., Sereti, I., Maldarelli, F., Whitby, D., Marshall, V., Goncalves, P. H., Khetani, V., Figg, W. D., Steinberg, S. M., Zeldis, J. B., & Yarchoan, R.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2016-12-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 4125-4131
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC5477825
- OpenAlex
- W2528836681
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2018-07-01)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Celgene
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (HHSN261200800001E.)
- National Institutes of Health (Contract No. HHSN261200800001E., #HHSN261200800001E, HHSN261200800001C)
- National Cancer Institute (No. HHSN261200800001E, Contract No.,HHSN261200800001E, HHSN261200800001E))
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN261200800001E)
- NIH Clinical Center (HHSN261200800001E)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- Kaposi's sarcoma, pomalidomide, HIV infection, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, oral immunomodulatory therapy, tumor response, health-related quality of life, neutropenia, antiretroviral therapy
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Sarcoma, Kaposi, Thalidomide, HIV Infections, Treatment Outcome, Angiogenesis Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review