Phase I Trial of the Human Double Minute 2 Inhibitor MK-8242 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To evaluate MK-8242 in patients with wild-type TP53 advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: MK-8242 was administered orally twice a day on days 1 to 7 in 21-day cycles. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined on the basis of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and by mRNA expression of the p53 target gene pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 3 ( PHLDA3). Other objectives were to characterize the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship, correlate biomarkers with response, and assess tumor response. Results: Forty-seven patients received MK-8242 across eight doses that ranged from 60 to 500 mg. Initially, six patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): grade (G) 2 nausea at 120 mg; G3 fatigue at 250 mg; G2 nausea and G4 thrombocytopenia at 350 mg; and G3 vomiting and G3 diarrhea at 500 mg. DLT criteria were revised to permit management of GI toxicities. Dosing was resumed at 400 mg, and four additional DLTs were observed: G4 neutropenia and G4 thrombocytopenia at 400 mg and G4 thrombocytopenia (two patients) at 500 mg. Other drug-related G3 and G4 events included anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, nausea, hyperbilirubinemia, hypophosphatemia, and anorexia. On the basis of safety, tolerability, PK, and PD, the RP2D was established at 400 mg (15 evaluable patients experienced two DLTs). PK for 400 mg (day 7) showed Cmax 3.07 μM, Tmax 3.0 hours, t1/2 (half-life) 6.6 hours, CL/F (apparent clearance) 28.9 L/h, and Vd/F (apparent volume) 274 L. Blood PHLDA3 mRNA expression correlated with drug exposure ( R 2= 0.68; P < .001). In 41 patients with postbaseline scans, three patients with liposarcoma achieved a partial response (at 250, 400, and 500 mg), 31 showed stable disease, and eight had progressive disease. In total, 27 patients with liposarcoma had a median progression-free survival of 237 days. Conclusion: At the RP2D of 400 mg twice a day, MK-8242 activated the p53 pathway with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. The observed clinical activity (partial response and prolonged progression-free survival) provides an impetus for further study of HDM2 inhibitors in liposarcoma.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In vivo studies demonstrated that MK-8242 delayed tumor growth by a factor of two or more in 10 of 17 solid tumor xenografts containing wild-type TP53, but had no effect on osteosarcoma xenografts with low TP53 expression.
“In vivo studies demonstrated that MK-8242 delayed tumor growth by a factor of two or more in 10 of 17 solid tumor xenografts containing wild-type TP53, but had no effect on osteosarcoma xenografts with low TP53 expression.377–380”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [378]
MK-8242 exhibited a strong inhibitory effect on wild-type PPTP cells with an IC50 value of 0.07 μM, but had weak inhibitory effects on TP53-mutant PPTP cells with an IC50 value greater than 10 μM, indicating a selectivity of more than 100 times.
“It exhibited a strong inhibitory effect on wild-type PPTP cells with an IC50 value of 0.07 μM, but had weak inhibitory effects on TP53-mutant PPTP cells with an IC50 value greater than10 μM), indicating a selectivity of more than 100 times.”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [378]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 120
- Authors
- Wagner, A. J., Banerji, U., Mahipal, A., Somaiah, N., Hirsch, H., Fancourt, C., Johnson-Levonas, A. O., Lam, R., Meister, A. K., Russo, G., Knox, C. D., Rose, S., & Hong, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Andrew J. Wagner, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Udai Banerji, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Amit Mahipal, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Neeta Somaiah and David S. Hong, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Heather Hirsch, Craig Fancourt, Amy O. Johnson-Levonas, Raymond Lam, Amy K. Meister, Giuseppe Russo, Clayton D. Knox, and Shelonitda Rose, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, NJ.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-04-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1304-1311
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC5946729
- OpenAlex
- W2518057821
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
- Keywords
- wild-type p53, advanced solid tumors, dose-limiting toxicity, recommended phase 2 dose, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, liposarcoma, dose escalation, treatment response biomarkers, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, oral anticancer drugs
- MeSH terms
- Cytarabine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review