Cited by 399Lung Cancer Research StudiesPARP inhibition in cancer therapyLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Study of Temozolomide in Combination With Either Veliparib or Placebo in Patients With Relapsed-Sensitive or Refractory Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Pietanza, M. Catherine, Waqar, Saiama N., Krug, Lee M., Dowlati, Afshin, Hann, Christine L., Chiappori, Alberto, Owonikoko, Taofeek K., Woo, Kaitlin M. +16 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose Both temozolomide (TMZ) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This phase II, randomized, double-blind study evaluated whether addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib to TMZ improves 4-month progression-free survival (PFS). Patients and Methods A total of 104 patients with recurrent SCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral veliparib or placebo 40 mg twice daily, days 1 to 7, and oral TMZ 150 to 200 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, of a 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Response was determined by imaging at weeks 4 and 8, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Improvement in PFS at 4 months was the primary end point. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of veliparib with TMZ. Exploratory objectives included PARP-1 and SLFN11 immunohistochemical expression, MGMT promoter methylation, and circulating tumor cell quantification. Results No significant difference in 4-month PFS was noted between TMZ/veliparib (36%) and TMZ/placebo (27%; P = .19); median OS was also not improved significantly with TMZ/veliparib (8.2 months; 95% CI, 6.4 to 12.2 months; v 7.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3 to 9.5 months; P = .50). However, ORR was significantly higher in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib compared with TMZ/placebo (39% v 14%; P = .016). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia more commonly occurred with TMZ/veliparib: 50% versus 9% and 31% versus 7%, respectively. Significantly prolonged PFS (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .009) and OS (12.2 v 7.5 months; P = .014) were observed in patients with SLFN11-positive tumors treated with TMZ/veliparib. Conclusion Four-month PFS and median OS did not differ between the two arms, whereas a significant improvement in ORR was observed with TMZ/veliparib. SLFN11 expression was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib, suggesting a promising biomarker of PARP-inhibitor sensitivity in SCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2018.77.7672

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [1]von Pawel J Schiller JH Shepherd FA et al: Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17: 658- 667, 1999 10080612
  2. [2]O’Brien ME Ciuleanu TE Tsekov H et al: Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 5441- 5447, 2006 17135646
  3. [3]Eckardt JR von Pawel J Pujol JL et al: Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 2086- 2092, 2007 17513814
  4. [5]Ardizzoni A Hansen H Dombernowsky P et al: Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 15: 2090- 2096, 1997 9164222
  5. [7]Byers LA Wang J Nilsson MB et al: Proteomic profiling identifies dysregulated pathways in small cell lung cancer and novel therapeutic targets including PARP1. Cancer Discov 2: 798- 811, 2012 22961666 PMC3567922
  6. [8]Toyooka S Toyooka KO Maruyama R et al: DNA methylation profiles of lung tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 1: 61- 67, 2001 12467239
  7. [9]Gerson SL: Clinical relevance of MGMT in the treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 20: 2388- 2399, 2002 11981013
  8. [10]Esteller M Herman JG: Generating mutations but providing chemosensitivity: The role of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase in human cancer. Oncogene 23: 1- 8, 2004 14712205
  9. [11]Pietanza MC Byers LA Minna JD et al: Small cell lung cancer: Will recent progress lead to improved outcomes? Clin Cancer Res 21: 2244- 2255, 2015 25979931 PMC4497796
  10. [12]Pietanza MC Kadota K Huberman K et al: Phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with relapsed sensitive or refractory small cell lung cancer, with assessment of methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase as a potential biomarker. Clin Cancer Res 18: 1138- 1145, 2012 22228633
  11. [14]Memisoglu A Samson L: Base excision repair in yeast and mammals. Mutat Res 451: 39- 51, 2000 10915864
  12. [15]Schreiber V Amé JC Dollé P et al: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 (PARP-2) is required for efficient base excision DNA repair in association with PARP-1 and XRCC1. J Biol Chem 277: 23028- 23036, 2002 11948190
  13. [16]Tentori L Graziani G: Chemopotentiation by PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Res 52: 25- 33, 2005 15911331
  14. [17]Palma JP Wang YC Rodriguez LE et al: ABT-888 confers broad in vivo activity in combination with temozolomide in diverse tumors. Clin Cancer Res 15: 7277- 7290, 2009 19934293
  15. [18]Lok BH Gardner EE Schneeberger VE et al: PARP inhibitor activity correlates with SLFN11 expression and demonstrates synergy with temozolomide in small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23: 523- 535, 2017 27440269 PMC5241177
  16. [19]Cardnell RJ Feng Y Diao L et al: Proteomic markers of DNA repair and PI3K pathway activation predict response to the PARP inhibitor BMN 673 in small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19: 6322- 6328, 2013 24077350 PMC3882158
  17. [20]de Bono J Ramanathan RK Mina L et al: Phase I, dose-escalation, two-part trial of the parp inhibitor talazoparib in patients with advanced germline BRCA1/2 mutations and selected sporadic cancers. Cancer Discov 7: 620- 629, 2017 28242752 PMC5905335
  18. [21]Owonikoko TK Dahlberg SE Khan SA et al: A phase 1 safety study of veliparib combined with cisplatin and etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2511). Lung Cancer 89: 66- 70, 2015 25985977 PMC4539011
  19. [24]Zauderer MG Drilon A Kadota K et al: Trial of a 5-day dosing regimen of temozolomide in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancers with assessment of methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Lung Cancer 86: 237- 240, 2014 25194640 PMC4497567
  20. [25]Allison Stewart C Tong P Cardnell RJ et al: Dynamic variations in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), ATM, and SLFN11 govern response to PARP inhibitors and cisplatin in small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 8: 28575- 28587, 2017 28212573 PMC5438673
  21. [26]Murai J, Tang SW, Leo E, et al: SLFN11 blocks stressed replication forks independently of ATR. Mol Cell 69:371-384 e6, 2018 PMC5802881 29395061
  22. [27]Zoppoli G Regairaz M Leo E et al: Putative DNA/RNA helicase Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 15030- 15035, 2012 22927417 PMC3443151
  23. [28]Polley E Kunkel M Evans D et al: Small cell lung cancer screen of oncology drugs, investigational agents, and gene and microRNA expression. J Natl Cancer Inst 108: djw122, 2016 PMC6279282 27247353
  24. [29]Murai J Feng Y Yu GK et al: Resistance to PARP inhibitors by SLFN11 inactivation can be overcome by ATR inhibition. Oncotarget 7: 76534- 76550, 2016 27708213 PMC5340226
  25. [30]Hattermann K Mehdorn HM Mentlein R et al: A methylation-specific and SYBR-green-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction technique for O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation analysis. Anal Biochem 377: 62- 71, 2008 18384736
  26. [31]Esteller M Toyota M Sanchez-Cespedes M et al: Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is associated with G to A mutations in K-ras in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 60: 2368- 2371, 2000 10811111
  27. [32]Esteller M Hamilton SR Burger PC et al: Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res 59: 793- 797, 1999 10029064
  28. [33]Cristofanilli M Budd GT Ellis MJ et al: Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 781- 791, 2004 15317891
  29. [34]Danila DC Heller G Gignac GA et al: Circulating tumor cell number and prognosis in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13: 7053- 7058, 2007 18056182
  30. [35]Krebs MG Sloane R Priest L et al: Evaluation and prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 29: 1556- 1563, 2011 21422424
  31. [36]Mateo J Carreira S Sandhu S et al: DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 373: 1697- 1708, 2015 26510020 PMC5228595
  32. [37]Lara PN Jr Moon J Redman MW et al: Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: A patient-level analysis of Southwest Oncology Group trials. J Thorac Oncol 10: 110- 115, 2015 25490004 PMC4320001
  33. [38]Ardizzoni A Tiseo M Boni L: Validation of standard definition of sensitive versus refractory relapsed small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of topotecan second-line trials. Eur J Cancer 50: 2211- 2218, 2014 24981975
  34. [39]Owonikoko TK Behera M Chen Z et al: A systematic analysis of efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in sensitive and refractory small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7: 866- 872, 2012 22722788 PMC3381878
  35. [40]Gupta SK Mladek AC Carlson BL et al: Discordant in vitro and in vivo chemopotentiating effects of the PARP inhibitor veliparib in temozolomide-sensitive versus -resistant glioblastoma multiforme xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 20: 3730- 3741, 2014 24838527 PMC4111895
  36. [41]Smith MA Reynolds CP Kang MH et al: Synergistic activity of PARP inhibition by talazoparib (BMN 673) with temozolomide in pediatric cancer models in the pediatric preclinical testing program. Clin Cancer Res 21: 819- 832, 2015 25500058 PMC4587665
  37. [42]Hopkins TA Shi Y Rodriguez LE et al: Mechanistic dissection of PARP1 trapping and the impact on in vivo tolerability and efficacy of PARP inhibitors. Mol Cancer Res 13: 1465- 1477, 2015 26217019
  38. [44]Lord CJ Ashworth A: PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science 355: 1152- 1158, 2017 28302823 PMC6175050
  39. [47]Kaufman B Shapira-Frommer R Schmutzler RK et al: Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 33: 244- 250, 2015 25366685 PMC6057749
  40. [48]Gardner EE Lok BH Schneeberger VE et al: Chemosensitive relapse in small cell lung cancer proceeds through an EZH2-SLFN11 axis. Cancer Cell 31: 286- 299, 2017 28196596 PMC5313262

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pietanza, M. C., Waqar, S. N., Krug, L. M., Dowlati, A., Hann, C. L., Chiappori, A., Owonikoko, T. K., Woo, K. M., Cardnell, R. J., Fujimoto, J., Long, L., Diao, L., Wang, J., Bensman, Y., Hurtado, B., de Groot, P., Sulman, E. P., Wistuba, I. I., Chen, A., Fleisher, M., Heymach, J. V., Kris, M. G., Rudin, C. M., & Byers, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • M. Catherine Pietanza, Lee M. Krug, Mark G. Kris, and Charles M. Rudin, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Kaitlin M. Woo, Yevgeniva Bensman, Brenda Hurtado, and Martin Fleisher, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Saiama N. Waqar, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO; Afshin Dowlati, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH; Christine L. Hann, Johns Hopkins...
Corresponding author
Byers, Lauren Averett
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
36
Issue
23
Pages
2386-2394
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2808238124
Cited by
399
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 12
FWCI
15.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • LUNGevity Foundation
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sidney Kimmel Foundation for Cancer Research
  • Celgene
  • Puma Biotechnology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Genentech
  • EMD Serono
  • Ignyta
  • National Cancer Institute (UM1CA186716, P50CA070907, P30CA008748, UM1CA186688, R01CA207295, P30CA016672, UM1CA186691)
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
temozolomide, veliparib, small cell lung cancer, relapsed small cell lung cancer, PARP inhibitors, PARP1, SLFN11, MGMT promoter methylation, progression-free survival, overall survival, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, circulating tumor cells, combination chemotherapy, immunohistochemical markers, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1, Temozolomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Benzimidazoles, DNA Mutational Analysis, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Nuclear Proteins, Placebos, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Biomarkers, Tumor, DNA Modification Methylases, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, DNA Methylation, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, DNA Repair Enzymes, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review