Cited by 811Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsBrain Metastases and TreatmentLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

CNS Response to Osimertinib Versus Standard Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Untreated EGFR -Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Reungwetwattana, Thanyanan, Nakagawa, Kazuhiko, Cho, Byoung Chul, Cobo, Manuel, Cho, Eun Kyung, Bertolini, Alessandro, Bohnet, Sabine, Zhou, Caicun +10 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: We report CNS efficacy of osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer from the phase III FLAURA study. Patients and Methods: Patients (N = 556) were randomly assigned to osimertinib or standard EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib); brain scans were not mandated unless clinically indicated. Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included. In patients with symptomatic CNS metastases, neurologic status was required to be stable for ≥ 2 weeks after completion of definitive therapy and corticosteroids. A preplanned subgroup analysis with CNS progression-free survival as primary objective was conducted in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiologic review. The CNS evaluable-for-response set included patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Results: Of 200 patients with available brain scans at baseline, 128 (osimertinib, n = 61; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 67) had measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, including 41 patients (osimertinib, n = 22; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 19) with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Median CNS progression-free survival in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions was not reached with osimertinib (95% CI, 16.5 months to not calculable) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.3 months to not calculable) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .014 [nominally statistically significant]). CNS objective response rates were 91% and 68% in patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 34.9; P = .066) and 66% and 43% in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = .011) treated with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, respectively. Probability of experiencing a CNS progression event was consistently lower with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion: Osimertinib has CNS efficacy in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer. These results suggest a reduced risk of CNS progression with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2018.78.3118

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Osimertinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with brain metastases and appears superior to first-generation TKIs in treating CNS metastases and reducing incidence of de novo CNS lesions.

    “osimertinib has also demonstrated efficacy in patients with brain metastases.13,81 Based on analysis of CNS activity in the FLAURA trial, osimertinib appears superior to first-generation TKIs in treating CNS metastases and in reducing the incidence of de novo CNS lesions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reungwetwattana, T., Nakagawa, K., Cho, B. C., Cobo, M., Cho, E. K., Bertolini, A., Bohnet, S., Zhou, C., Lee, K. H., Nogami, N., Okamoto, I., Leighl, N., Hodge, R., McKeown, A., Brown, A. P., Rukazenkov, Y., Ramalingam, S. S., & Vansteenkiste, J.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-11-20
Volume
36
Issue
33
Pages
3290-3297
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2888877308
Cited by
811
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 4
FWCI
53.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
osimertinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, erlotinib, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, brain metastases, CNS progression-free survival, FLAURA trial, targeted therapy, treatment-emergent adverse events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review