CNS Response to Osimertinib Versus Standard Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Untreated EGFR -Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: We report CNS efficacy of osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer from the phase III FLAURA study. Patients and Methods: Patients (N = 556) were randomly assigned to osimertinib or standard EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib); brain scans were not mandated unless clinically indicated. Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included. In patients with symptomatic CNS metastases, neurologic status was required to be stable for ≥ 2 weeks after completion of definitive therapy and corticosteroids. A preplanned subgroup analysis with CNS progression-free survival as primary objective was conducted in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiologic review. The CNS evaluable-for-response set included patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Results: Of 200 patients with available brain scans at baseline, 128 (osimertinib, n = 61; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 67) had measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, including 41 patients (osimertinib, n = 22; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 19) with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Median CNS progression-free survival in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions was not reached with osimertinib (95% CI, 16.5 months to not calculable) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.3 months to not calculable) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .014 [nominally statistically significant]). CNS objective response rates were 91% and 68% in patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 34.9; P = .066) and 66% and 43% in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = .011) treated with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, respectively. Probability of experiencing a CNS progression event was consistently lower with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion: Osimertinib has CNS efficacy in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer. These results suggest a reduced risk of CNS progression with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Osimertinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with brain metastases and appears superior to first-generation TKIs in treating CNS metastases and reducing incidence of de novo CNS lesions.
“osimertinib has also demonstrated efficacy in patients with brain metastases.13,81 Based on analysis of CNS activity in the FLAURA trial, osimertinib appears superior to first-generation TKIs in treating CNS metastases and in reducing the incidence of de novo CNS lesions.”
From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [81]
Cites
Cross, D. A. E., Ashton, S. E., Ghiorghiu, S., Eberlein, C., Nebhan, C. A., Spitzler, P. J., Orme, J. P., Finlay, M. R. V., Ward, R. A., Mellor, M. J., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0337 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
Wu, Y.-L., Ahn, M.-J., Garassino, M. C., Han, J.-Y., Katakami, N., Kim, H. R., Hodge, R., Kaur, P., Brown, A. P., Ghiorghiu, D., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.77.9363 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Self-citationGoss, G., Tsai, C.-M., Shepherd, F. A., Ahn, M.-J., Bazhenova, L., Crinò, L., de Marinis, F., Felip, E., Morabito, A., Hodge, R., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx820 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citationHata, A., Katakami, N., Yoshioka, H., Takeshita, J., Tanaka, K., Nanjo, S., Fujita, S., Kaji, R., Imai, Y., Monden, K., et al. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28364 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, <i>EGFR</i> -Mutated Advanced NSCLC
Ramalingam, S. S., Vansteenkiste, J., Planchard, D., Cho, B. C., Gray, J. E., Ohe, Y., Zhou, C., Reungwetwattana, T., Cheng, Y., Chewaskulyong, B., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1913662 · Cited by 2,914 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, J. C. H., Kim, S.-W., Kim, D.-W., Lee, J.-S., Cho, B. C., Ahn, J.-S., Lee, D. H., Kim, T. M., Goldman, J. W., Natale, R. B., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.00457 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Self-citationNagasaka, M., Zhu, V. W., Lim, S. M., Greco, M., Wu, F., & Ou, S.-H. I. (2021) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.11.028 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings
Harvey, R. D., Adams, V. R., Beardslee, T., & Medina, P. (2020) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155220931926 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Liu, X., Hong, L., Nilsson, M., Hubert, S. M., Wu, S., Rinsurongkawong, W., Lewis, J., Spelman, A., Roth, J., Swisher, S., et al. (2020) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.023 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Shi, Y., Zhou, J., Zhao, Y., Zhu, B., Zhang, L., Li, X., Fang, J., Shi, J., Zhuang, Z., Yang, S., et al. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02692-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reungwetwattana, T., Nakagawa, K., Cho, B. C., Cobo, M., Cho, E. K., Bertolini, A., Bohnet, S., Zhou, C., Lee, K. H., Nogami, N., Okamoto, I., Leighl, N., Hodge, R., McKeown, A., Brown, A. P., Rukazenkov, Y., Ramalingam, S. S., & Vansteenkiste, J.
- Affiliations
- Kyushu University (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2018-11-20
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 3290-3297
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2888877308
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 53.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- osimertinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, erlotinib, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, brain metastases, CNS progression-free survival, FLAURA trial, targeted therapy, treatment-emergent adverse events
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review