Cited by 59Frailty in Older AdultsGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Optimizing chemotherapy for frail and elderly patients (pts) with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGOAC): the GO2 phase III trial

Open access
Hall, Peter S, Swinson, Daniel, Waters, Justin S., Wadsley, Jonathan, Falk, Stephen, Roy, Rajarshi, Tillett, Tania, Nicoll, Jonathan +12 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

4006 Background: Many pts with aGOAC are elderly and/or frail. We previously compared epirubin/ oxaliplatin/ capecitabine (EOCap) vs OCap vs Cap in a pick-the-winner study and found OCap best. GO2 was designed to find the optimum dose of OCap and to explore the use of an objective baseline geriatric assessment to individualize doses for maximum Overall Treatment Utility (OTU), a composite of clinical benefit, tolerability, QL and patient value. Methods: Pts with aGOAC were eligible if unsuitable for full-dose EOCap due to age or frailty, but fit for OCap; GFR ≥ 30, bili <2x ULN. Baseline assessment included global QL; symptoms; functional scales; comorbidity; frailty. Randomization was 1:1:1 to dose Level A (Ox 130 mg/m 2 d1, Cap 625 mg/m 2 bd d1-21, q21d), B (80% Level A doses) or C (60% Level A doses). Pts with GFR 30-50 ml/min or bili 1.5-2.0 xULN received 75% of the allocated dose of Cap. At 9 wks, pts were scored for OTU. Continuation thereafter was based on clinical judgement. Non-inferiority (vs A) was assessed using PFS censored at 12 months, with boundary HR 1.34 (based on discussion with pts and clinicians), needing 284 PFS events per 2-way comparison. Baseline fitness was assessed as predictive of OTU, overall and by interaction with dose level. Results: 514 pts were randomised, 2014-17, at 61 UK centres. Clinical trial information: 44687907. Non-inferiority of PFS is confirmed for Level B vs A (HR 1.09, CI 0.89-1.32) and for Level C vs A (HR 1.10, CI 0.90-1.33). Level C pts had less toxicity and better OTU outcomes than A or B. When analysed by baseline age, frailty and PS, Level C produced the best OTU even in younger, less frail and better PS patients; no group was identified who benefit more from the higher dose levels. Conclusions: This is the largest RCT to date specifically investigating frail and/or elderly aGOAC pts, and should guide future treatment. The lowest dose tested was non-inferior in terms of PFS and produced less toxicity and better overall treatment utility.[Table: see text]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.4006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 59

Authors
Hall, P. S., Swinson, D., Waters, J. S., Wadsley, J., Falk, S., Roy, R., Tillett, T., Nicoll, J., Cummings, S., Grumett, S. A., Kamposioras, K., Garcia, A., Allmark, C., Marshall, H., Ruddock, S., Katona, E., Velikova, G., Petty, R. D., Grabsch, H. I., & Seymour, M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • St James, Leeds, United Kingdom;
  • Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone, United Kingdom;
  • Weston Park Cancer Centre (GB)
  • Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom;
  • Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
  • Royal United Hospital (GB)
  • North Cumbria University Hospitals, Carlisle, United Kingdom;
  • Royal Surrey County Hospital (GB)
  • The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
  • Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Betsi Cadwaladr LHB, Bangor, United Kingdom;
  • National Cancer Research Institute (GB)
  • CTRU, Leeds, United Kingdom;
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network, Leeds, United Kingdom;
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
37
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
4006-4006
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2947294063
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
advanced gastroesophageal cancer, elderly patients, frailty, oxaliplatin, capecitabine, dose optimization, non-inferiority, progression-free survival, geriatric assessment, individualized dosing, functional status, performance status, comorbidities, quality of life, chemotherapy toxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review