The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with clinical benefit in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Abstract
e16038 Background: In other cancers such as metastatic lung and melanoma, pts who experience irAEs may have a greater degree of clinical benefit. We sought to evaluate whether the development of irAEs correlates with clinical benefits in mUC pts. Methods: We identified mUC pts who received PD-1/L1 inhibitors at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). The severity of irAEs was graded using CTCAE v.5.0. Clinical benefit was defined as any objective reduction (complete- or partial- response) in tumor burden. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate for differences in the proportion of pts experiencing clinical benefit between pts experiencing an irAEs within 90 days after starting therapy and those who did not experience an irAEs. The log-rank test assessed differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between cohorts. Results: A total of 199 mUC pts were enrolled between July 2013 and October 2018 [median (range) age, 69.6 (26.6-89.0) years; 141 men (70.9%), 58 women (29.1%)]. 114 (57.3%) pts were treated with anti-PD-1 and 85 (42.7%) with anti-PD-L1. irAEs were observed in 67 pts (33.7%), of which 34 (17.1%) < 90 days from start of therapy. Common irAEs included 20 (29.9%) hypothyroidism, 17 (25.4%) colitis, 12 (17.9%) rash/pruritus, and 10 (14.9%) transaminitis. Grade ≥3 irAEs were observed in 14 pts (20.9%).13 (40.6%) pts with irAE < 90 days experienced clinical benefit compared with 21 (17.8%) of pts with no irAE (p-value = 0.008). No difference (p = 0.26 and 0.18) was observed for either PFS (6-month PFS = 19.2% vs 35.3% for no irAE and irAE < 90 days) or OS (1-year OS = 41.8% vs 57.7% for no irAE vs irAE < 90 days). Conclusions: The development of irAEs within 90 days from starting therapy in mUC pts may herald clinical benefit in pts with mUC. Further evaluation of this potential relationship in a large prospective study is warranted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“No statistically significant differences were observed for either 6-month PFS (35.3% vs 19.2%, p = .21) or 1-year OS (57.7% vs 41.8%, p = .18) between patients who developed IRAE onset < 90 days and in those who did not develop IRAEs.”
From Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2019) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“No statistically significant differences were observed for either 6-month PFS (35.3% vs 19.2%, p = .21) or 1-year OS (57.7% vs 41.8%, p = .18) between patients who developed IRAE onset < 90 days and in those who did not develop IRAEs.”
From Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2019) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Of 199 total patients treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies, in patients who developed IRAE onset < 90 days, DCR was 40.6% compared to 17.8% patients who did not develop IRAEs (p = .008).”
From Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2019) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Das, S., & Johnson, D. B. (2019) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0805-8 · Cited by 1,145
Park, R., Lopes, L., & Saeed, A. (2020) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-020-02397-5 · Cited by 50
Risk of Rash in PD-1 or PD-L1-Related Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tian, Y., Zhang, C., Dang, Q., Wang, K., Liu, Q., Liu, H., Shang, H., Zhao, J., Xu, Y., Wu, T., et al. (2022) · Journal of Oncology · doi:10.1155/2022/4976032 · Cited by 8
Jiang, Q., Liu, J., Li, Z., Zhang, C., Dang, Q., & Tian, Y. (2026) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000049720
Metadata
- Authors
- Pier Vitale, N., Pond, G. R., Abou Alaiwi, S., Nassar, A., Flippot, R., Choueiri, T. K., Harshman, L. C., & Sonpavde, G.
- Affiliations
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
- McMaster University (CA)
- Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2019-05-20
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 15_suppl
- Pages
- e16038-e16038
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2946993394
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- immune-related adverse events, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors, clinical benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, hypothyroidism, colitis, elevated liver enzymes, immune-related pneumonitis, immune-related endocrinopathy, immune-related dermatitis, immune-related encephalitis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review