Cited by 126CAR-T cell therapy researchMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Orvacabtagene autoleucel (orva-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T cell therapy for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): update of the phase 1/2 EVOLVE study (NCT03430011).

Abstract

8504 Background: Orva-cel is an investigational, BCMA-directed CAR T cell product with a fully human binder. Over 100 pts have been treated in the EVOLVE phase 1 study. Pts treated at 50 and 150 × 10 6 CAR+ T cells were previously reported (Mailankody ASH 2018 #957). We now report results of the higher dose levels (DLs) in 51 pts who received orva-cel manufactured using the process intended to support commercial use. Methods: Pts with RRMM who had ≥3 prior regimens, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), received orva-cel at 300, 450, and 600 × 10 6 CAR+ T cells after lymphodepletion with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide. Results: Median pt age was 61 (range, 33–77) y; median time from diagnosis was 7.0 (range, 1.7–23.6) y, with a median of 6 (range, 3–18) prior regimens. Overall, 92% of pts were penta-exposed (2 IMiDs, 2 PIs, and an mAb); 61% of pts received bridging therapy (77% were refractory to bridging therapy). Two pts had dose-limiting toxicities: grade 3 neurological event (NE) for >7 d at 300 × 10 6 CAR+ T cells and grade 4 neutropenia for >28 d at 450 × 10 6 CAR+ T cells. Key efficacy and safety outcomes are shown in the Table. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS)/NEs were managed with tocilizumab and/or steroids (78%), anakinra (14%), and/or vasopressors (6%). Grade ≥3 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia at 29 d occurred in 21%, 55%, and 44% of pts (median time to resolution to grade ≤2 of any cytopenia, ≤2.1 mo). Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 14%. After a median follow-up (F/U) of 5.9 mo, median progression-free survival was not reached. Conclusions: Orva-cel at 300, 450, and 600 × 10 6 CAR+ T cells demonstrated manageable safety (CRS grade ≥3: 2%; NE grade ≥3: 4%) and compelling efficacy in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, with a 91% objective response rate (ORR) and 39% complete response (CR)/stringent CR (sCR) rate. Updated results will be presented, including minimal residual disease, durability of response, and recommended phase 2 dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03430011 . [Table: see text]

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.8504

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the phase 1/2 EVOLVE study, the ORR to orva-cel was 91%, and 39% of patients achieved a CR/sCR.

    “The ORR was 91% and 39% of patients achieved a CR/sCR.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [251]

  • After a median follow-up of 5.9 months, the median PFS with orva-cel was not reached.

    “After a median follow-up of 5.9 months, the median PFS was not reached, suggesting prolonged disease control and favorable outcomes in terms of disease progression.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [251]

  • Grade ≥ 3 infections occurred in 14% of patients treated with orva-cel.

    “Grade ≥ 3 infections occurred in 14% of patients, indicating that some patients experienced severe infections as a side effect of treatment [251].”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [251]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mailankody, S., Jakubowiak, A. J., Htut, M., Costa, L. J., Lee, K., Ganguly, S., Kaufman, J. L., Siegel, D. S. D., Bensinger, W., Cota, M., Doerr, T., DeVries, T., & Wong, S. W. K.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • Winship Cancer Institute (US)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA;
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2020-05-20
Volume
38
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
8504-8504
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3028760088
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 14
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
BCMA, CAR T-cell therapy, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, EVOLVE trial, dose escalation, neurological events, cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, neutropenia, treatment-related adverse events, complete response, progression-free survival, CAR T cell manufacturing, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review