Cited by 30CAR-T cell therapy researchMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CARTITUDE-2: Efficacy and safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) after one to three prior lines of therapy.

Abstract

8013 Background: Cilta-cel is a CAR T-cell therapy expressing two BCMA-targeting, single-domain antibodies designed to confer avidity. The multicohort, phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 study (NCT04133636) is evaluating cilta-cel safety and efficacy in various clinical settings for patients (pts) with MM and exploring suitability of outpatient administration. Here, we present initial results from Cohort A. Methods: Cohort A pts had progressive MM after 1–3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), were lenalidomide refractory, and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given 5–7 days (d) after start of lymphodepletion (daily cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m 2] and fludarabine [30 mg/m 2] for 3 d). The primary objective was minimal residual disease (MRD) 10-5 negativity. Secondary outcomes were response rates (IMWG) and safety (per CTCAE; CRS and ICANS by ASTCT). Results: As of Feb 2021 data cutoff (median follow-up: 5.8 months [mo]; range: 2.5–9.8 mos), 20 pts (65% male; median age 60 years [38–75]) received cilta-cel; 1 pt was treated in an outpatient setting. Pts received a median of 2 prior LOT (1–3); 12 pts received < 3 prior lines and 8 received 3 prior LOT. All pts were exposed to PI, IMiD, and dexamethasone, 95% to alkylating agents, and 65% to daratumumab. The majority (95%) were refractory to the last LOT; 40% were triple refractory. Overall response rate was 95% (95% CI: 75–100), 75% (95% CI: 51–91) achieved stringent CR/CR, and 85% (95% CI: 62–97) achieved ≥VGPR. Median time to first response was 1.0 mo (0.7–3.3); median time to best response was 1.9 mo (0.9–5.1). Median duration of response was not reached. All pts (n = 4) with MRD-evaluable samples at 10-5 at data cutoff were MRD-negative. Hematologic AEs ≥20% were neutropenia (95%; gr 3/4: 90%), thrombocytopenia (80%; gr 3/4: 35%), anemia (65%; gr 3/4: 40%), lymphopenia (60%; gr 3/4: 55%), and leukopenia (55%; all gr 3/4). CRS occurred in 85% of pts; 10% were gr 3/4. Median time to CRS onset was 7 d (5–9), with a median duration of 3.5 d (2–11). CAR T-cell neurotoxicity occurred in 20% of pts (all gr 1/2). Three pts had ICANS (1 gr 1; 2 gr 2); median time to onset was 8 d (7–11) and median duration was 2 d (1–2). One pt had gr 2 facial paralysis; time to onset was 29 d with a duration of 51 d. One death occurred due to COVID-19 (assessed as treatment (tx)-related by investigator). Safety profile was manageable in the pt treated in an outpatient setting. Conclusions: A single cilta-cel infusion at the recommended phase 2 dose led to early and deep responses with a manageable safety profile in pts with MM who had 1–3 prior LOT. Updated efficacy and safety findings will inform suitability of outpatient tx in this and other cohorts of CARTITUDE-2 as well as the CARTITUDE-4 study. Clinical trial information: NCT04133636.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agha, M. E., Cohen, A. D., Madduri, D., Cohen, Y. C., Delforge, M., Hillengass, J., Goldschmidt, H., Weisel, K., Raab, M.-S., Scheid, C., Schecter, J. M., De Braganca, K. C., Varsos, H., Wang, L., Vogel, M., Carrasco-Alfonso, M., Akram, M., Wu, X., Nesheiwat, T., & Einsele, H.
Affiliations
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY;
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
  • Janssen R&D, Raritan, NJ;
  • Janssen (United States) (US)
  • Legend Biotech (United States) (US)
  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-05-20
Volume
39
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
8013-8013
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3166986377
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  • Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
ciltacabtagene autoleucel, BCMA, CAR T-cell therapy, multiple myeloma, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, minimal residual disease negativity, lymphocyte depletion, outpatient administration, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, treatment safety, progression-free survival, overall survival, lenalidomide-refractory myeloma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review