Cited by 20CAR-T cell therapy researchMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biological correlative analyses and updated clinical data of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and early relapse after initial therapy: CARTITUDE-2, cohort B.

Abstract

8029 Background: In cohort B of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study, the efficacy and safety of cilta-cel are being evaluated in patients (pts) with MM who had early relapse after initial therapy. These pts have functionally high-risk disease, with early relapse post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) being a poor prognostic factor and representing an unmet medical need. We present updated results. Methods: Eligible pts had MM, received 1 prior LOT (PI and IMiD required), had disease progression per IMWG (either ≤12 mo after ASCT or ≤12 mo after start of anti-myeloma therapy for pts who did not undergo ASCT), and were tx-naive to CAR-T/anti-BCMA therapies. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given post lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy were assessed, and the primary endpoint was MRD negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were implemented to minimize risk of movement/neurocognitive AEs (MNTs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (C max and T max of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood) are being conducted, as well as analyses of levels of CRS-related cytokines (eg, IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with ICANS, and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022, 19 pts (median age 58.0 y [range 44–67]; 74% male; median follow-up 13.4 mo [range 5.2–21.7]) received cilta-cel. 79% of pts received prior ASCT. ORR was 100.0%, 90% achieved CR or better, and 95% achieved ≥VGPR. Median time to first response and best response were 0.95 mo (range 0.9–9.7) and 5.1 mo (range 0.9–11.8), respectively. Of pts who were MRD-evaluable (n = 15), 14 (93%) achieved MRD 10-5 negativity during this study. Median DOR was not reached and 12-mo event-free rate was 88.9%. The 12-mo PFS rate was 90%. Median time to onset of CRS was 8 d (range 5–11) and occurred in 16 (84.2%) pts (1 gr 4). CRS resolved in all pts. ICANS (gr 1) occurred in 1 pt; MNT (gr 3) occurred in 1 pt, previously reported. 1 pt died post cilta-cel due to PD at d 158. Preliminary PK analyses indicate that peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred on d 13.1 (range 8.96–209.9) and median persistence was 76.9 d (range 40.99–221.8). Conclusions: A single cilta-cel infusion led to deep and durable responses in a functionally high-risk pt population who experienced early clinical relapse/tx failure to initial therapy, with a manageable safety profile. In this pt population with ineffective or insufficient response to ASCT, cilta-cel led to responses. Responses continue to deepen, and follow-up is ongoing. Updated and in-depth PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation will be presented and provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT04133636.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.8029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van de Donk, N. W. C. J., Agha, M. E., Cohen, A. D., Cohen, Y. C., Anguille, S., Kerre, T., Roeloffzen, W., Schecter, J. M., De Braganca, K. C., Varsos, H., Mistry, P., Roccia, T., Zudaire, E., Corsale, C., Akram, M., Geng, D., Nesheiwat, T., Bubuteishvili-Pacaud, L., Sonneveld, P., & Zweegman, S.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
  • Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ;
  • Janssen (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Janssen R&D, Spring House, PA;
  • Legend Biotech (United States) (US)
  • Legend Biotech USA, Piscataway, NJ;
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
40
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
8029-8029
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4286296483
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC
  • Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
ciltacabtagene autoleucel, BCMA, CAR T-cell therapy, multiple myeloma, early recurrence, autologous stem cell transplantation, minimal residual disease negativity, complete response, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, interleukin-6, pharmacokinetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review