Cited by 17Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersHepatitis B Virus Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab and radiologically and pathologically quantifiable responses through modulation of the tumour microenvironment in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

4129 Background: Liver resection (LR) is a potentially curative option for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being investigated in the perioperatory setting to improve long-term relapse rates and survival outcomes. Methods: PRIME‐HCC is a phase Ib study testing nivolumab (3 mg/kg, day 1 and day 22) plus ipilimumab (1mg/kg, day 1 only) (N+I) prior to LR in resectable HCC. Primary endpoint was safety, while secondary endpoints included radiological response (per RECIST v1.1) and pathological response on resection specimens (ReS). Translational endpoints encompassed analysis of tissue samples with multiplex immunohistochemistry (MIHC) and gut microbiota profiling with high-throughput sequencing and their correlation with response. Results: As of 7 th of February 2023, 25 patients (pts) were enrolled, all Child-Pugh A, mostly male (n=18, 72%), with cirrhosis (n=13, 52%), and viral hepatitis (44%, 4 HBV and 7 HCV). Any-grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 88% pts (n=22), of which 24% (n=6) grade (G) 3. No G4-5 AEs were recorded. Any-grade treatment-related (tr)AEs were reported by 72% pts (n=18), including 8% G3 trAEs (n=1 ALT/AST elevation and n=1 dyspnea). After a median follow-up of 14.5 months (95% CI 7.0-22.0), 21 pts were assessed for radiological response and underwent surgery. Median time from treatment start to LR was 2.4 months (interquartile range 2.2-2.7). LR was delayed in 1 pt (4.8%) because of G2 tr-hypothyroidism but occurred uneventfully. Objective response rate was 29% (n=5 partial responses, n=1 complete response [CR]); disease control rate was 95% (n=20), with 1 progressor having a mixed HCC/cholangiocarcinoma. Major pathological response (MPR), defined as ≥70% tumour regression, was observed in 56% (n=9) of the pathologically evaluable ReS (n=16), with 38% pathological CR (n=6). In the MIHC analyses, pretreatment biopsies of MPR pts were significantly enriched in peritumoral CD4+ and CD8+ cells, with no intratumoral difference. When comparing baseline biopsies and ReS, MPR pts had a significant decrease of intratumoral FOXP3+/CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), while peritumoral Tregs increased significantly in non-MPR ReS. In baseline stool samples, α and β diversity did not differ across responders (R) and non-responders (NR), nor it changed after ICI. However, pre-treatment stool samples of NR pts were significantly enriched in Alistipes and Colinsella genera. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant N+I is feasible and tolerable for early-stage HCC, with promising radiological and pathological response rates. Study of tissue and gut microbiota highlights tumor and host-related changes. Immune infiltrate and gut microbiota composition lend themselves as predictors of anti-tumour efficacy of N+I combination. Clinical trial information: NCT03682276 .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.4129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
D'Alessio, A., Pai, M., Spalding, D., Goldin, R. D., Scheiner, B., Korolewicz, J., Fulgenzi, C. A. M., Ward, C., Yip, V., Slater, S., Akarca, A., Sodergren, M., Tait, P., Habib, N. A., Thomas, R., Cortellini, A., Marafioti, T., Marchesi, J. R., Sharma, R., & Pinato, D. J. J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
41
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
4129-4129
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4379336787
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Funder: Bristol Myers Squibb.
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Institute of Hepatology, Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416), the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust
  • Infrastructural support by the Cancer Research UK Imperial Centre and the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, ipilimumab, nivolumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, hepatectomy, tumor microenvironment, radiological response, pathological response, multiplex immunohistochemistry, gut microbiota, treatment-related adverse events, early-stage liver cancer, liver cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, predictive biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review