Cited by 45Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Individualized neoantigen therapy mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab in resected melanoma: 3-year update from the mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial.

Abstract

LBA9512 Background: mRNA-4157 is a novel, mRNA-based individualized neoantigen therapy designed to increase endogenous antitumor T-cell responses by targeting unique patient (pt) tumor mutations. In the primary analysis of the Ph 2 mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial (median planned follow-up, 23 mo), pts with completely resected high-risk stage IIIB–IV cutaneous melanoma receiving mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab (pembro; combo) had prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) vs pembro alone (Weber JS, et al. Lancet. 2024). Methods: Pts were assigned 2:1 to mRNA-4157 (1 mg IM, max 9 doses) + pembro (200 mg IV, max 18 cycles) or pembro alone. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed RFS; secondary endpoints were DMFS and safety. This planned supportive analysis was triggered when the last randomized pt had ≥2 y follow-up. Translational subgroup analyses were also reported. HLA genotypes were analyzed by exome sequencing of DNA from PBMC. RFS and DMFS were not formally tested; nominal 2-sided p-values are descriptive. Results: With an additional year follow-up (data cutoff, 03 Nov 2023; median [range], 34.9 [25.1–51.0] mo) after primary analysis, minimal new events occurred. RFS benefit in the combo vs pembro arm was maintained with 49% risk reduction in recurrence and/or death (HR [95% CI], 0.510 [0.288–0.906]; 2-sided nominal p-value 0.019). The 2.5-yr RFS rate of combo treatment (tx) vs pembro alone was 74.8% vs 55.6%. Combo tx also produced clinically meaningful, sustained improvement in DMFS vs pembro alone (HR [95% CI], 0.384 [0.172–0.858], 2-sided nominal p-value 0.0154). OS favored combo vs pembro alone; 2.5-y OS rate was 96.0% vs 90.2% (HR [95% CI], 0.425 [0.114–1.584]). RFS benefit of combo vs pembro was maintained in TMB high (HR [95% CI], 0.564 [0.253–1.258]), TMB non-high (0.571 [0.245–1.331]), PD-L1 positive (0.471 [0.226–0.979]), PD-L1 negative (0.147 [0.034–0.630]), and ctDNA negative (0.207 [0.091–0.470]) subgroups; ctDNA positive HR was not estimable. No significant associations between individual HLA alleles and RFS were observed in either tx arm. Maximal heterozygosity at HLA class I genotype loci (A, B, C) improved RFS vs homozygosity for ≥1 locus in the pembro arm (HR [95% CI], 0.425 [0.179–1.01]) but not combo arm (1.252 [0.498–3.146]). mRNA-4157 was well tolerated and combo tx had a safety profile consistent with previous analysis with no potentiation of immune-related AEs. Conclusions: The current analysis with ∼3 y median follow-up showed durable and meaningful long-term RFS and DMFS benefit with mRNA-4157 + pembro vs pembro alone. A trend for improved OS with combo tx was also observed. HLA and translational subgroup results suggest mRNA-4157 + pembro may benefit a broader pt population vs pembro alone. Clinical trial information: NCT03897881 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba9512

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 45

Metadata

Authors
Weber, J. S., Khattak, M. A., Carlino, M. S., Meniawy, T., Taylor, M. H., Ansstas, G., Kim, K. B., McKean, M., Sullivan, R. J., Faries, M. B., Tran, T., Cowey, C. L., Medina, T., Segar, J. M., Atkinson, V., Gibney, G. T., Luke, J. J., Buchbinder, E. I., Long, G. V., Meehan, R. S., & INT Research and Development Author Group
Affiliations
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • St John of God Subiaco Hospital (AU)
  • Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
  • Sarah Cannon (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Angeles Clinic and Research Institute (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
  • University of Arizona Cancer Center (US)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
  • Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Melanoma Institute Australia (AU)
  • Moderna Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-06-10
Volume
42
Issue
17_suppl
Pages
LBA9512-LBA9512
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4399451701
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 6
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Moderna, Inc., in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
pembrolizumab, cutaneous melanoma, resected melanoma, recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, HLA typing, cancer mutations, immune checkpoint inhibitors, long-term follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review