Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline

Geiger, Jessica L., Ismaila, Nofisat, Beadle, Beth, Caudell, Jimmy J., Chau, Nicole, Deschler, Daniel, Glastonbury, Christine, Kaufman, Marnie, Lamarre, Eric, Lau, Harold Y., Licitra, Lisa, Moore, Michael G., Rodriguez, Cristina, Roshal, Anna, Seethala, Raja, Swiecicki, Paul, Ha, Patrick·2021·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations. RECOMMENDATIONS: When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.21.00449

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 118 references

Metadata

Authors
Geiger, J. L., Ismaila, N., Beadle, B., Caudell, J. J., Chau, N., Deschler, D., Glastonbury, C., Kaufman, M., Lamarre, E., Lau, H. Y., Licitra, L., Moore, M. G., Rodriguez, C., Roshal, A., Seethala, R., Swiecicki, P., & Ha, P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-06-10
Volume
39
Issue
17
Pages
1909-1941
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3157336873
Cited by
441
References
118
FWCI
51.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.21.00449
The paper
Geiger, J. L., Ismaila, N., Beadle, B., Caudell, J. J., Chau, N., Deschler, D., Glastonbury, C., Kaufman, M., Lamarre, E., Lau, H. Y., Licitra, L., Moore, M. G., Rodriguez, C., Roshal, A., Seethala, R., Swiecicki, P., & Ha, P. (2021). Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.21.00449

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.