Cited by 1,445Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Five-Year Survival Outcomes From the PACIFIC Trial: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Spigel, David R., Faivre-Finn, Corinne, Gray, Jhanelle E., Vicente, David, Planchard, David, Paz-Ares, Luis, Vansteenkiste, Johan F., Garassino, Marina C. +17 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The phase III PACIFIC trial compared durvalumab with placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III non–small-cell lung cancer and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Consolidation durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87; P = .00251) and progression-free survival (PFS [blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1]; stratified HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; P < .0001), with manageable safety. We report updated, exploratory analyses of survival, approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned. METHODS: Patients with WHO performance status 0 or 1 (any tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 status) were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; administered once every 2 weeks for 12 months) or placebo, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Time-to-event end point analyses were performed using stratified log-rank tests. Medians and landmark survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Seven hundred and nine of 713 randomly assigned patients received durvalumab (473 of 476) or placebo (236 of 237). As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up, 34.2 months [all patients]; 61.6 months [censored patients]), updated OS (stratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; median, 47.5 v 29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; median, 16.9 v 5.6 months) remained consistent with the primary analyses. Estimated 5-year rates (95% CI) for durvalumab and placebo were 42.9% (38.2 to 47.4) versus 33.4% (27.3 to 39.6) for OS and 33.1% (28.0 to 38.2) versus 19.0% (13.6 to 25.2) for PFS. CONCLUSION: These updated analyses demonstrate robust and sustained OS and durable PFS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and 33.1% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive and free of disease progression, establishing a new benchmark for standard of care in this setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.21.01308

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many patients still fail to achieve clinically meaningful responses to ICI treatment.

    “Although ICI-treatment is approved for the treatment of NSCLC patients in the localized and metastatic setting regardless of PD-L1 status2–4, many patients still fail to achieve clinically meaningful responses.”

    From Predicting the tumor microenvironment composition and immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer from digital histopathology images (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results, under “Antitumor Response” (page not provided), report a 29.8% objective response rate with durvalumab, supporting the point that many patients did not have an objective response. The trial studied durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC; it does not establish the broader claim about clinically meaningful responses to ICI treatment across NSCLC settings. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Antonia SJ Villegas A Daniel D: Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 379: 2342- 2350, 2018 30280658
  2. [4]Gray JE Villegas A Daniel D: Three-year overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC - update from PACIFIC. J Thorac Oncol 15: 288- 293, 2019 31622733 PMC7244187
  3. [5]Faivre-Finn C Vicente D Kurata T: Four-year survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC - an update from the PACIFIC trial. J Thorac Oncol 16: 860- 867, 2021 33476803
  4. [6]Hui R Özgüroğlu M Villegas A: Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (PACIFIC): A randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 20: 1670- 1680, 2019 31601496
  5. [8]Pmda: List of Approved Products: Financial Year 2018. https://www.pmda.go.jp/english/review-services/reviews/approved-information/drugs/0002.html
  6. [9]Yoon SM Shaikh T Hallman M: Therapeutic management options for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 8: 1- 20, 2017 28246582 PMC5309711
  7. [10]Auperin A Le Pechoux C Rolland E: Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 2181- 2190, 2010 20351327
  8. [11]Bradley JD Hu C Komaki RR: Long-term results of NRG oncology RTOG 0617: Standard- versus high-dose chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 38: 706- 714, 2020 31841363 PMC7048161
  9. [12]Hansen RN Zhang Y Seal B: Long-term survival trends in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy: A SEER cancer registry analysis. BMC Cancer 20: 276, 2020 32248816 PMC7132866
  10. [13]Vokes EE Herndon JE II Kelley MJ: Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 25: 1698- 1704, 2007 17404369
  11. [14]Hanna N Neubauer M Yiannoutsos C: Phase III study of cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: The Hoosier Oncology Group and U.S. Oncology. J Clin Oncol 26: 5755- 5760, 2008 19001323
  12. [15]Senan S Brade A Wang LH: PROCLAIM: Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed-cisplatin or etoposide-cisplatin plus thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 34: 953- 962, 2016 26811519
  13. [16]Ahn JS Ahn YC Kim JH: Multinational randomized phase III trial with or without consolidation chemotherapy using docetaxel and cisplatin after concurrent chemoradiation in inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: KCSG-LU05-04. J Clin Oncol 33: 2660- 2666, 2015 26150444
  14. [17]Bradley JD Paulus R Komaki R: Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): A randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16: 187- 199, 2015 25601342 PMC4419359
  15. [18]Faivre-Finn C Spigel DR Senan S: Impact of prior chemoradiotherapy-related variables on outcomes with durvalumab in unresectable stage III NSCLC (PACIFIC). Lung Cancer 151: 30- 38, 2021 33285469
  16. [19]Paz-Ares L Spira A Raben D: Outcomes with durvalumab by tumour PD-L1 expression in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the PACIFIC trial. Ann Oncol 31: 798- 806, 2020 32209338 PMC8412232
  17. [20]Faehling M Schumann C Christopoulos P: Durvalumab after definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Real-world data on survival and safety from the German expanded-access program (EAP). Lung Cancer 150: 114- 122, 2020 33126091
  18. [21]Taugner J Käsmann L Eze C: Real-world prospective analysis of treatment patterns in durvalumab maintenance after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC patients. Invest New Drugs 39: 1189- 1196, 2021 33704621 PMC8280025
  19. [22]Jung HA Noh JM Sun JM: Real world data of durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 146: 23- 29, 2020 32505077
  20. [23]Berghmans T Paesmans M Sculier JP: Prognostic factors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A review of conventional, metabolic and new biological variables. Ther Adv Med Oncol 3: 127- 138, 2011 21904576 PMC3150064
  21. [24]Peters S Dafni U Boyer M: Position of a panel of international lung cancer experts on the approval decision for use of durvalumab in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Ann Oncol 30: 161- 165, 2019 30624547
  22. [25]Garassino MC Paz-Ares L Hui R: Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab by PD-L1 expression and prior chemoradiotherapy-related variables in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol 17: 1165- 1184, 2021 33583206
  23. [26]Antonia SJ Balmanoukian A Brahmer J: Clinical activity, tolerability, and long-term follow-up of durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 14: 1794- 1806, 2019 31228626
  24. [27]Melillo G Chand V Yovine A: Curative-intent treatment with durvalumab in early-stage cancers. Adv Ther 38: 2759- 2778, 2021 33881745 PMC8190020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spigel, D. R., Faivre-Finn, C., Gray, J. E., Vicente, D., Planchard, D., Paz-Ares, L., Vansteenkiste, J. F., Garassino, M. C., Hui, R., Quantin, X., Rimner, A., Wu, Y.-L., Özgüroğlu, M., Lee, K. H., Kato, T., de Wit, M., Kurata, T., Reck, M., Cho, B. C., Senan, S., Naidoo, J., Mann, H., Newton, M., Thiyagarajah, P., & Antonia, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Sarah Cannon (US)
  • The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
  • Chungbuk National University (KR)
  • Kanagawa Cancer Center (JP)
  • Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
  • Kansai Medical University Hospital (JP)
  • German Center for Lung Research (DE)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Spigel, David R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-04-20
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
1301-1311
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4210772672
Cited by
1,445
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 318 · 2025: 349 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 293 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 1
FWCI
181.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (P30 CA008748)
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer (P30 CA008748)
  • AstraZeneca (NCT02125461, P30 CA008748)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (P30 CA008748)
  • Celgene
  • Array BioPharma
  • Varian Medical Systems
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Exelixis (P30 CA008748)
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • Aeglea BioTherapeutics
  • Celldex Therapeutics
  • Novocure (P30 CA008748)
  • Clovis Oncology
  • Agios Pharmaceuticals
  • Mirati Therapeutics
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs
  • BeiGene
  • Calithera Biosciences
  • Apollomics
  • ViewRay
  • Puma Biotechnology
  • G1 Therapeutics
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (P30 CA008748)
  • Eisai (P30 CA008748)
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Ono Pharmaceutical (P30 CA008748)
  • Ipsen
  • National Institutes of Health (CA008748)
  • Genentech (P30 CA008748)
  • EMD Serono
  • Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NCT02125461)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA008748, P30CA008748)
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
durvalumab, stage III NSCLC, inoperable lung cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidation immunotherapy, five-year survival, overall survival, progression-free survival, PD-L1 expression, landmark analysis, long-term follow-up, PACIFIC trial, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, treatment safety, quality of life, treatment-related adverse events
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Disease Progression, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review