The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of bevacizumab, alone and in combination with irinotecan, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma in a phase II, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab 10 mg/kg alone or in combination with irinotecan 340 mg/m 2 or 125 mg/m 2 (with or without concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, respectively) once every 2 weeks. Primary end points were 6-month progression-free survival and objective response rate, as determined by independent radiology review. Secondary end points included safety and overall survival. RESULTS: In the bevacizumab-alone and the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan groups, estimated 6-month progression-free survival rates were 42.6% and 50.3%, respectively; objective response rates were 28.2% and 37.8%, respectively; and median overall survival times were 9.2 months and 8.7 months, respectively. There was a trend for patients who were taking corticosteroids at baseline to take stable or decreasing doses over time. Of the patients treated with bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab plus irinotecan, 46.4% and 65.8%, respectively, experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events, the most common of which were hypertension (8.3%) and convulsion (6.0%) in the bevacizumab-alone group and convulsion (13.9%), neutropenia (8.9%), and fatigue (8.9%) in the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan group. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in two patients (2.4%) in the bevacizumab-alone group (grade 1) and in three patients (3.8%) patients in the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan group (grades 1, 2, and 4, respectively). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab, alone or in combination with irinotecan, was well tolerated and active in recurrent glioblastoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanocarrier-based drug combination therapy for glioblastoma
Zhao, M., van Straten, D., Broekman, M. L. D., Préat, V., & Schiffelers, R. M. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.38147 · Cited by 373
Nonsurgical Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Gallego, O. (2015) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3747/co.22.2436 · Cited by 296
Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future
Obrador, E., Moreno-Murciano, P., Oriol-Caballo, M., López-Blanch, R., Pineda, B., Gutiérrez-Arroyo, J., Loras, A., Gonzalez-Bonet, L., Martinez-Cadenas, C., Estrela, J., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25052529 · Cited by 271
Anti-VEGF therapies in the clinic
Meadows, K. L., & Hurwitz, H. I. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006577 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, H. S., Prados, M. D., Wen, P. Y., Mikkelsen, T., Schiff, D., Abrey, L. E., Yung, W. K. A., Paleologos, N., Nicholas, M. K., Jensen, R., Vredenburgh, J., Huang, J., Zheng, M., & Cloughesy, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2023-11-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 4945-4952
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4388473705
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.22.02772
- The paper
- Friedman, H. S., Prados, M. D., Wen, P. Y., Mikkelsen, T., Schiff, D., Abrey, L. E., Yung, W. K. A., Paleologos, N., Nicholas, M. K., Jensen, R., Vredenburgh, J., Huang, J., Zheng, M., & Cloughesy, T. (2023). Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.02772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.