Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12Women's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Opportunistic Breast Cancer Education and Screening in Rural Honduras

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: In Honduras, the breast cancer burden is high, and access to women’s health services is low. This project tested the connection of community-based breast cancer detection with clinical diagnosis and treatment in a tightly linked and quickly facilitated format. Methods: The Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth College partnered with the Honduran cancer hospital La Liga Contra el Cancer to expand a cervical cancer screening program, which included self-breast exam (SBE) education and clinical breast exams (CBEs), to assess patient attitudes about and uptake of breast cancer education and screening services. The cervical cancer screening event was held in Honduras in 2013; 476 women from 31 villages attended. Results: Half of the women attending elected to receive a CBE; most had concerns about lactation. Clinicians referred 12 women with abnormal CBEs to La Liga Contra el Cancer for additional evaluation at no cost. All referred patients were compliant with the recommendation and received follow-up care. One abnormal follow-up mammogram/ultrasound result was negative on biopsy. One woman with an aggressive phyllodes tumor had a mastectomy within 60 days. Multimodal education about breast cancer screening maximized delivery of women’s health services in a low-tech rural setting. Conclusion: The addition of opportunistic breast cancer education and screening to a cervical cancer screening event resulted in high uptake of services at low additional cost to program sponsors. Such novel strategies to maximize delivery of women’s health services in low-resource settings, where there is no access to mammography, may result in earlier detection of breast cancer. Close follow-up of positive results with referral to appropriate treatment is essential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jgo.2015.001107

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Local men harvested and milled wood to make the structures of the exam cubicles that were clothed with bedsheets.
Fig 1 Local men harvested and milled wood to make the structures of the exam cubicles that were clothed with bedsheets.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Lemons are stand-ins for breasts, and Spanish language captions describe potential problems (used with permission of Corrine Ellsworth Beaumont22).
Fig 2 Lemons are stand-ins for breasts, and Spanish language captions describe potential problems (used with permission of Corrine Ellsworth Beaumont22).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig 3 A village leader used prepared materials to illustrate potential problems in breast health and to encourage women to inspect their breasts.
Fig 3 A village leader used prepared materials to illustrate potential problems in breast health and to encourage women to inspect their breasts.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Clinical breast exam (CBE) participation and results. CCS, cervical cancer screening (results published elsewhere); LLC, La Liga Cancer Center.
Fig 4 Clinical breast exam (CBE) participation and results. CCS, cervical cancer screening (results published elsewhere); LLC, La Liga Cancer Center.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Vorobiof DA, 2001, J Clin Oncol, 19, 125S
  2. Semiglazov VF, 1999, Vopr Onkol, 45, 265
  3. Leung J, 2014, Rural Remote Health, 14, 2730

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, L. S., Bejarano, S. A., Onega, T. L., Stenquist, D. S., & Chamberlin, M. D.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Chamberlin, Mary D.
Venue
Journal of Global Oncology
Published
2016-08
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
174-180
ISSN
2378-9506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341060139
Cited by
12
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Global Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dartmouth College
  • Norris Cotton Cancer Center
  • Audrey and Theodor Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
breast cancer screening, rural Honduras, cervical cancer screening, breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, breast cancer education, resource-limited settings, phyllodes tumor, mammography, ultrasound

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review