Electronic Health Records
Open accessAbstract
Forces are aligning to shift American health care into the Information Age: an age which financial institutions, airlines, supermarkets and most manufacturing industries have already entered.The shift, which these institutions have already experienced, will facilitate the establishment and widespread use of standardized databases in health care.The databases are known by the terms electronic medical records (EMRs), electronic health record (EHRs) or personal health records (PHRs).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EHRs are important clinical data repositories for patient medical history, family history, and lab results, enabling clinicians to conduct precise and well-informed diagnoses.
“EHRs are important clinical data repositories for patient medical history, family history, and lab results, enabling clinicians to conduct precise and well-informed diagnoses [163].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [163]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 86
- Authors
- Ambinder, E. P.
- Corresponding author
- Ambinder, Edward P.
- Venue
- Journal of Oncology Practice
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-63
- ISSN
- 1554-7477 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-469X
- PMC
- PMC2793588
- OpenAlex
- W1978177659
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, personal health records, health information technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
