The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategies for Heading Off is Project Failure
Abstract
Although investment in information technology and information systems continues to increase, projects continue to fail. As a result, IS projects, particularly software projects, are perceived as high risk. By categorizing types of risk, this article helps IS professionals and all project sponsors to identify classes of risk and choose the appropriate managerial behavior to mitigate each of them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Failure to achieve project goals is a result of the fact that project managers and project teams do not take the necessary measures to influence risks.
“failure to achieve project goals is a result of the fact that project managers and project teams do not take the necessary measures to influence risks (Cule et al. 2000).”
From Analysis of 105 IT Project Risks (2023) · cites this paper as Cule et al. 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1109/MC.1987.1663532 · DOI
- Johnson J., 1995, Application Development Trends, 2, 47
- 10.2307/249627 · DOI
- Reimus Byron, 1997, Harvard Business Review, 75, 22
- 10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 · DOI
- Kwon T. H., 1987, Critical Issues in Information Systems Research
- Boehm Barry, 1989, Software Risk Management Tutorial
- 10.1145/287831.287843 · DOI
- Humphrey Watts S., 1995, A Discipline for Software Engineering
- Brooks Fred P., 1995, The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of 105 IT Project Risks
Nikolaenko, V., & Sidorov, A. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm16010033 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Cule, P., Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., & Keil, M.
- Affiliations
- Marquette University (US)
- Bradley University (US)
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- Georgia State University (US)
- Venue
- Information Systems Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-69
- ISSN
- 1058-0530 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-8703
- OpenAlex
- W2087210541
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- project risk, risk classification, risk mitigation, software development projects, project management, project sponsors, IT investment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
