The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synthetic Task Environments for Teams: CERTT’s UAV-STE
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CERTT-UAS-STE (Cooke & Shope, 2004) was a testbed used in 18 articles in our search (e.g., Demir, et al., 2016; Demir, Cooke, et al., 2018; Demir, Likens et al., 2018, Demir, McNeese, et al. 2018; McNeese et al., 2018).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Cooke & Shope, 2004
In the citing paper
“Using the CERTT-UAS-STE platform (Cooke & Shope, 2004), the results are quite clear that human–human teams perform the best.”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Cooke & Shope, 2004
In the citing paper
“Specifically, the CERTT-UAS-STE (Cooke & Shope, 2004) and the MIX (Wright et al., 2014) were used in 24% and 20% of the studies, respectively”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Cooke & Shope, 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1083 · DOI · Paper page
- Gugerty, L., DeBoom, D., Walker, R., and Burns, J. (1999), Developing a simulated uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) task based on cognitive task analysis: task analysis results and preliminary simulator data, inProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp.86-90.
- Hutchins E., Cognition in the Wild, 10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Martin, E., Lyon, D.R., and Schreiber, B.T. (1998), Designing synthetic tasks for human factors research: an application to uninhabited air vehicles, inProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp.123-127.
- Zsambok C.E., Naturalistic Decision Making, Zsambok, 3
Cited by
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming
McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Myers, C. (2018) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720817743223 · Cited by 380
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooke, N., & Shope, S.
- Venue
- Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2004-08-30
- Pages
- 46-1-46-6
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic Task Environments for Teams: CERTT’s UAV-STE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9780203489925.ch46
- The paper
- Cooke, N., & Shope, S. (2004). Synthetic Task Environments for Teams: CERTT’s UAV-STE. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203489925.ch46
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
