The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Meta-Analysis in Medicine and Health Policy
Abstract
Meta-Analysis: Past and Present Challenges Dalene K. Stangl and Donald A. Berry Meta-Analysis of Heterogeneously Reported Study Results: A Bayesian Approach Keith R. Abrams, Paul C. Lambert, Bruno Sanso, and Chris Shaw Meta-Analysis versus Large Trials: Resolving the Controversy Scott M. Berry A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Mega-Trials for the Choice of Thrombolytic Agents in Acute Myocardial Infarction James Brophy and Lawrence Joseph Combining Studies with Continuous and Dichotomous Responses: A Latent-Variables Approach Francesca Dominici and Giovanni Parmigiani Computer-Modeling and Graphical Strategies for Meta-analysis William DuMouchel and Sharon-Lise Normand Meta-Analysis for 2 x 2 Tables with Multiple Treatment Groups Leon J. Gleser and Ingram Olkin A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Duration of Estrogen Exposure and Occurrence of Endometrial Cancer Daniel T. Larose Modeling and Implementation Issues in Bayesian Meta-Analysis Donna K. Pauler and Jon Wakefield Meta-Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data Nargis Rahman and Jon Wakefield Meta-Analysis of Individual-patient Survival Data Using Random-Effect Models Daniel J. Sargent, Benny C. Zee, Chantal Milan, Valter Torri, and Guido Francini Adjustment for Publication Bias and Quality Bias in Bayesian Meta-Analysis David D. Smith, Geof H. Givens, and Richard L. Tweedie Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials: Opportunities and Limitations Richard Simon Research Synthesis for Public Health Policy: Experience of the Institute of Medicine Michael A. Stoto Meta-Analysis in Practice: A Critical Review of Available Software Alexander J. Sutton, Paul C. Lambert, Martin A. G. Hellmich, Keith R. Abrams, and David
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905 · Cited by 2,955
Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
Dias, S., Welton, N. J., Caldwell, D. M., & Ades, A. E. (2010) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3767 · Cited by 2,521
A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00552.x · Cited by 2,569
Dias, S., Sutton, A. J., Ades, A. E., & Welton, N. J. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12458724 · Cited by 1,207
Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria
Goldberg, S. N., Grassi, C. J., Cardella, J. F., Charboneau, J. W., Dodd, G. D., Dupuy, D. E., Gervais, D., Gillams, A. R., Kane, R. A., Lee, F. T., et al. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2353042205 · Cited by 1,193
Metadata
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2000-04-20
- OpenAlex
- W1582495596
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis in Medicine and Health Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9780203909935
- The paper
- Meta-Analysis in Medicine and Health Policy. (2000). CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203909935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
