The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surrogates: Gaussian Process Modeling, Design, and Optimization for the Applied Sciences
Abstract
"Surrogates: a graduate textbook, or professional handbook, on topics at the interface between machine learning, spatial statistics, computer simulation, meta-modeling (i.e., emulation), design of experiments, and optimization. Experimentation through simulation, "human out-of-the-loop" statistical support (focusing on the science), management of dynamic processes, online and real-time analysis, automation, and practical application are at the forefront. Topics include: Gaussian process (GP) regression for flexible nonparametric and nonlinear modeling. Applications to uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, calibration of computer models to field data, sequential design/active learning and (blackbox/Bayesian) optimization under uncertainty. Advanced topics include treed partitioning, local GP approximation, modeling of simulation experiments (e.g., agent-based models) with coupled nonlinear mean and variance (heteroskedastic) models. Treatment appreciates historical response surface methodology (RSM) and canonical examples, but emphasizes contemporary methods and implementation in R at modern scale. Rmarkdown facilitates a fully reproducible tour, complete with motivation from, application to, and illustration with, compelling real-data examples. Presentation targets numerically competent practitioners in engineering, physical, and biological sciences. Writing is statistical in form, but the subjects are not about statistics. Rather, they're about prediction and synthesis under uncertainty; about visualization and information, design and decision making, computing and clean code"--...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Emulators are often statistical models, for example, Gaussian process emulators [23, 24], although they could also utilize lower-fidelity physics-based models [25].”
From Credibility assessment of in silico clinical trials for medical devices (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Credibility assessment of in silico clinical trials for medical devices
Pathmanathan, P., Aycock, K., Badal, A., Bighamian, R., Bodner, J., Craven, B. A., & Niederer, S. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012289 · Cited by 62
Hourdin, F., Ferster, B., Deshayes, J., Mignot, J., Musat, I., & Williamson, D. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf2758 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Gramacy, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gramacy, Robert B.
- ORCID
- Gramacy, Robert B.
- Venue
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 2020-03-10
- OpenAlex
- W4235606958
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Keywords
- Gaussian process regression, surrogate models, computer simulation experiments, meta-model, simulation-based optimization, model emulation, R code
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review