IVIM fMRI: Brain activation with a high spatial specificity and resolution
Abstract
This section will cover tagging of book web only.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IVIM MRI has been combined with BOLD fMRI in a complementary "negative" approach that improves spatial specificity by suppressing signals from large feeding arteries and draining veins.
“IVIM MRI has also been combined with BOLD fMRI in a complementary “negative” approach that improves spatial specificity by suppressing signals from large feeding arteries and draining veins (Song et al., 2018).”
From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Song et al., 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers
Le Bihan, D. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1365
“IVIM MRI has also been combined with BOLD fMRI in a complementary “negative” approach that improves spatial specificity by suppressing signals from large feeding arteries and draining veins ( Song et al., 2018).”
- Authors
- Song, A. W., Bruce, I., Petty, C., & Chen, N.-K.
- Venue
- Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MRI
- Publisher
- Jenny Stanford Publishing
- Published
- 2018-11-05
- Pages
- 99-114
- OpenAlex
- W2920922779
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Keywords
- intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion MRI, brain activation, spatial specificity, spatial resolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
