The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Project Management Maturity Model
Abstract
Assisting organizations in improving their project management processes, the Project Management Maturity Model defines the industry standard for measuring project management maturity.Project Management Maturity Model, Second Edition provides a roadmap showing organizations how to move to higher levels of organizational behavior, improving
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crawford's studies found that the formation and development of professional competencies recorded in the PMBOK Guide require the systematic accreditation of project participants.
“Crawford's studies support this assumption; he found that the formation and development of professional competencies recorded in the PMBOK Guide ® require the systematic accreditation of project participants (Crawford 2006).”
From Analysis of 105 IT Project Risks (2023) · cites this paper as Crawford 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of 105 IT Project Risks
Nikolaenko, V., & Sidorov, A. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm16010033 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawford, J. K.
- Corresponding author
- Crawford, J. Kent
- Venue
- Auerbach Publications eBooks
- Publisher
- Auerbach Publications
- Published
- 2006-07-24
- OpenAlex
- W594871724
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Auerbach Publications eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Keywords
- project management maturity model, project management process improvement, organizational behavior, maturity levels, project management standards, organizational change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review