CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Identification and Quantification in FoodFood Safety and HygieneFood and Agricultural Sciences

Food Forensics: Stable Isotopes as a Guide to Authenticity and Origin

·2017·CRC Press eBooks
DOI 10.1201/9781315151649
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781315151649

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry (SIRMS) analysis is a powerful authentication approach widely applied for authenticity and geographic origin investigations.

    “Stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry (SIRMS) analysis is a powerful authentication approach widely applied for authenticity and geographic origin investigations (48).”

    From Authenticity and the Potability of Coconut Water - a Critical Review (2020) · cites this paper as [48]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
CRC Press eBooks
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2017-07-28
DOI
10.1201/9781315151649
OpenAlex
W2941188084
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
food forensics, food adulteration, food authenticity, food traceability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review