Cited by 726Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceData Analysis with RStatistics Education and Methodologies

Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan

McElreath, Richard·2018·Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Abstract

Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan builds readers’ knowledge of and confidence in statistical modeling. Reflecting the need for even minor programming in today’s model-based statistics, the book pushes readers to perform step-by-step calculations that are usually automated. This unique computational approach ensures that readers understand enough of the details to make reasonable choices and interpretations in their own modeling work. The text presents generalized linear multilevel models from a Bayesian perspective, relying on a simple logical interpretation of Bayesian probability and maximum entropy. It covers from the basics of regression to multilevel models. The author also discusses measurement error, missing data, and Gaussian process models for spatial and network autocorrelation. By using complete R code examples throughout, this book provides a practical foundation for performing statistical inference. Designed for both PhD students and seasoned professionals in the natural and social sciences, it prepares them for more advanced or specialized statistical modeling. Web ResourceThe book is accompanied by an R package (rethinking) that is available on the author’s website and GitHub. The two core functions (map and map2stan) of this package allow a variety of statistical models to be constructed from standard model formulas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781315372495

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior predictive checks confirmed the appropriateness of the priors, and the training process converged with no diagnostic issues.

    “Afterwards, we perform prior predictive checks to confirm their appropriateness [25]. Once assessing that the training process converged accordingly [37] and no diagnostic suggested issues [25], we evaluate the model.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McElreath, R.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
McElreath, Richard
Venue
Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
Published
2018-01-03
OpenAlex
W4247539597
Cited by
726
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.84
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
Keywords
Bayesian analysis, statistical modeling, maximum entropy, measurement error, missing data, Gaussian processes, spatial autocorrelation, network autocorrelation, Stan, regression analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review