Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Iterated random functions

·2017·Stochastic Processes

Abstract

This chapter aims to stochastic processes defined in terms of iterations of random functions. It illustrates the models in biology with ancestral type evolution processes, as well as in combinatorics and group theory with card shuffling techniques. The chapter is concerned with a series of iterated random processes arising in the construction and the analysis of fractal images. It is mainly taken from the seminal article of D. Aldous and P. Diaconis. A Cantor discontinuum subset of is a closed and nowhere dense and non-empty subset of the unit interval. Thus, the Lebesgue integral of this set is equal to zero. These "almost" empty fractal sets were introduced in 1883 by the German mathematician Georg Cantor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781315381619-26

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Venue
Stochastic Processes
Published
2017-02-24
Pages
693-704
OpenAlex
W2035811299
Cited by
434
References
31
FWCI
124.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterated random functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781315381619-26
The paper
Iterated random functions. (2017). Stochastic Processes. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315381619-26

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.