The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements
Abstract
Integrates the latest theory, methodology and applications related to the design and analysis of repeated measurement. The text covers a broad range of topics, including the analysis of repeated measures design, general crossover designs, and linear and nonlinear regression models. It also contains a 3.5 IBM compatible disk, with software to implem
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Dongen, H. P. A., Maislin, G., Mullington, J. M., & Dinges, D. F. (2003) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/26.2.117 · Cited by 3,173
Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.4.57.18512 · Cited by 1,204
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments
Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.423 · Cited by 677
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Craig, T. J., Teetsb, S., Lehman, E. B., Chinchilli, V. M., & Zwillich, C. (1998) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70171-x · Cited by 249
Self-citation
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781482293272
- The paper
- Vonesh, E., & Chinchilli, V. M. (1996). Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482293272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
