Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTechnology Use by Older AdultsCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of the cognitive ability among aging groups using mobile phone

Kim, Jung-Yong, Cho, Young-Jin·2010·Ergonomics for All: Celebrating PPCOE's 20 years of Excellence
DOI 10.1201/b10529-90
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b10529-90

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fisk A.D., 1955, Designing for Older Adults
  2. Folstein M.F., 1975, Journal of ligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). New York: The Psy-Psychiatric Research, 12, 189
  3. Koh H.J., 2000, Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 21, 1131

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J.-Y., & Cho, Y.-J.
ORCID
Kim, Jung-Yong
Venue
Ergonomics for All: Celebrating PPCOE's 20 years of Excellence
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2010-09-29
Pages
479-484
DOI
10.1201/b10529-90
OpenAlex
W2492661573
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive ability, aging, older adults, mobile devices, cognitive assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the cognitive ability among aging groups using mobile phone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/b10529-90
The paper
Kim, J.-Y., & Cho, Y.-J. (2010). Evaluation of the cognitive ability among aging groups using mobile phone. Ergonomics for All: Celebrating PPCOE's 20 years of Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10529-90

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.