The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Accuracy Of Spatial Databases
Abstract
Error modelling for the map overlay operation modelling error in overlaid categorical maps user considerations in landscape characterization knowledge-based approaches to determining and correcting areas of unreliability in geographical databases observations and comments on the generation and treatment of error in digital GIS data developing confidence limits on errors of suitability analyses in geographical information systems distance calculations and errors in geographical databases inclusion of accuracy data in a feature based, object- orientated data model accuracy and bias issues in surface representation modelling error in objects and fields frame independence spatial analysis modelling locational uncertainty via hierarchical tesselation minimum cross-entropy convex decompositions of pixel-indexed stochastic matrices - a geographical application of the Ising model the traditional and modern look at Tissot's indicatrix real data and real problems - dealing with large spatial databases the small number problems and the accuracy of spatial databases demand point approximations for location problems modelling realibility on statistical surfaces by polygon filtering scale-independent spatial analysis the effect of data aggregation on a poisson model of Canadian migration statistical methods for inference between incompatible zonal systems statistical effect of spatial data transformations - a proposed general framework learning to live with errors in spatial databases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Fotheringham, A. S., & Wong, D. W. S. (1991) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a231025 · Cited by 1,540
Spatial data analysis: theory and practice
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3486 · Cited by 965
Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS
Goodchild, M. F., Yuan, M., & Cova, T. J. (2007) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658810600965271 · Cited by 458
A Framework for the Areal Interpolation of Socioeconomic Data
Goodchild, M. F., Anselin, L., & Deichmann, U. (1993) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a250383 · Cited by 417
Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models
Fisher, P. F., & Tate, N. J. (2006) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133306pp492ra · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 1989-12-06
- OpenAlex
- W1970562816
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Accuracy Of Spatial Databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/b12612
- The paper
- The Accuracy Of Spatial Databases. (1989). CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.