The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implementing Early Intervention in Psychosis: A Guide to Establishing Psychosis Services
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the setting up of specialised centers focused on treating young people in order to secure better outcomes and prevent the accrual of disabilities. This practical handbook is aimed at mental health professionals and administrators. The rationale for early intervention is outlined and the authors describe the key elements of an early intervention strategy. There is strong emphasis on program evaluation and specific suggestions for application in an early psychosis context. Common issues and challenges in implementing early psychosis foci in the real world are highlighted. Numerous examples of early intervention strategies in operation around the globe are provided and progress on an international early psychosis consensus statement is outlined. 25 international advisors have been involved in the development of the project, making the book a unique, relevant and constructive guide for all professionals involved in this area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The proportion of deaths from CVD in the general population comparison group (7%) is consistent with 2014 ONS data, where in a similar age range, CVD mortality represented 6% of all deaths.69”
From Mortality gap for people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: UK-based cohort study 2000–2014 (2017) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence and future directions
MCGORRY, P. D., KILLACKEY, E., & YUNG, A. (2008) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2008.tb00182.x · Cited by 581
Self-citationMortality gap for people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: UK-based cohort study 2000–2014
Hayes, J. F., Marston, L., Walters, K., King, M. B., & Osborn, D. P. J. (2017) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.117.202606 · Cited by 451
Psychosocial Treatments for Schizophrenia
Mueser, K. T., Deavers, F. E., Penn, D. L., & Cassisi, J. E. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185620 · Cited by 423
“…emphasized client goals appropriate to the developmental stage when their illness developed (e.g., school, independent living, close relationships), and have striven to engender a strong sense of hope for the future with both clients and family members (Edwards & McGorry 2002, McGorry et al. 2006).”
BackgroundLambert, M., Conus, P., Lubman, D., Wade, D., Yuen, H. P., Moritz, S., Naber, D., McGorry, P., & Schimmelmann, B. (2005) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00554.x · Cited by 349
Self-citationMcGorry, P. D., Nelson, B., Goldstone, S. D., & Yung, A. R. (2010) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371005500803 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, J., & McGorry, P. D.
- ORCID
- McGorry, Patrick D.
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2002-03-14
- OpenAlex
- W4238894983
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- early intervention in psychosis, early psychosis, youth, program evaluation, implementation barriers, international consensus statement, disability prevention, mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
