Cited by 20Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ecology and Conservation of the Maned Wolf: Multidisciplinary Perspectives

Abstract

Wolves are controversial figures worldwide and much effort has focused on how to conserve them while addressing public concerns. With its solitary habits and fruit-eating diet, the endangered maned wolf roams the South American grasslands and swamps, playing a vital part in maintaining biodiversity hotspots. Compared to the grey wolf, little is kno

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b15607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Consorte-McCrea, A., & Santos, E. F.
Venue
CRC Press eBooks
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2013-10-24
OpenAlex
W1604292988
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
maned wolf, wolf conservation, threatened species, grassland, biodiversity conservation, solitary carnivores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review