Cited by 23Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

A trio of inference problems that could win you a Nobel Prize in statistics (if you help fund it)

Open access
Xiao‐Li Meng·2014·Past, Present, and Future of Statistical Science

Abstract

Statistical inference is a field full of problems whose solutions require the same intellectual force needed to win a Nobel Prize in other scientific fields. Multiresolution inference is the oldest of the trio. But emerging applications such as individualized medicine have challenged us to the limit: infer estimands with resolution levels that far exceed those of any feasible estimator. Multi-phase inference is another reality because (big) data are almost never collected, processed, and analyzed in a single phase. The newest of the trio is multisource inference, which aims to extract information in data coming from very different sources, some of which were never intended for inference purposes. All of these challenges call for an expanded paradigm with greater emphases on qualitative consistency and relative optimality than do our current inference paradigms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/b16720-52

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meng, X.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Xiao‐Li Meng
Venue
Past, Present, and Future of Statistical Science
Published
2014-03-26
Pages
561-586
OpenAlex
W1726802995
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
statistical inference, personalized medicine, estimands, data sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review